The chart gives information about how much carbon dioxide was emitted per person (on average) in four countries (United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal) during forty years (1967-2007).
We can see that CO2 emissions per person in Italy and Portugal increased dramatically over the entire time. Looking at Italy, which sent out more CO2 than Portugal, the rate CO2 emissions per person climbed markedly from well above 4 (metric tonnes) to just beneath 8 (m.t). This trend reflected in CO2 gas in Portugal, with the lowest amount in all nations in 1967 (1 m.t) and reaching its peak at roughly 5 (m.t) at the end of the period.
However, turning to U.K. and Sweden, we see that this pattern was roughly reversed. United Kingdom, with the highest average CO2 emissions between these countries, had emitted 11 (m.t) in 1967 and went down slowly to approximately 9 (m.t). The average emissions of this gas in Sweden were a noticeable exception, as it had a marked rise and fall, peaking at just over 10 (m.t) in 1977, dropping by about half (similar to Portugal CO2 emissions) in 2007.
Overall, it is apparent that although the U.K. and Portugal had a reversed pattern, they sent out the highest and lowest amount of CO2 among four nations over the period in question.
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 57
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your 70
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77981651376 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45917769175 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.264493199 43.030603864 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.666666667 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3333333333 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272613396591 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137379695258 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856933913206 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165770707693 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795081403508 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.