Governments have a tendency to invest and fund for infrastructure, especially on roads or railways. In my opinion, I agree that authorities ought to allocate the majority of budget to construct railways facilities as it will benefit individuals, economy, and environment.
A good reason to spend more money on introducing railways is that it reduces the rate of road accidents. At present, some cars drive fast and exceed speed limit, causing car accidents in roads. Trains, however, move at controlled speed in specific tracks, and their risk of accidents is quite low. Moreover, sleep is another worrying challenge for car drivers which leads to climbing the figures of car accidents. This issue has no place in trains because they use auto driver, which are more safer than human drivers.
Another point to consider is that investment in rail structures means the consumption of fossil fuel will fall dramatically due to decreasing the number of private autos in roads. For instance, a car can carry up to 4 or 5 persons, but a train with high capacity is able to transfer the abundance passengers. This comes to reduce fuel usage, and both individuals and government benefit from this cost-effective approach.
Finally, funding for railways in a nation will help tackle air pollution, for the simple reason that reduction in care usage will result in reducing gas emission. Consuming green energy, electric trains play a potential role in our modern society to combat pollution problems and clean the environment.
In conclusion, spending the large budget on railways instead of roads is a must for any government that enhance their people life balance.
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...because they use auto driver, which are more safer than human drivers. Another point to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efit from this cost-effective approach. Finally, funding for railways in a natio...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion problems and clean the environment. In conclusion, spending the large budget...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19259259259 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86855139498 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659259259259 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3688720151 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157801774309 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521447325454 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396938023891 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847306357403 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219204050554 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.