Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern world, the education system or the teaching process has changed a lot to assure the maximum benefit, and they are a huge responsibility on the teachers shoulders to build awesome generation that in future will be the key for wonderful life. Moreover, from my point of view creates sharing in the class between students to do any project is better than doing the same work or project alone. And my opinion will be analyzed in this essay for further enlighten.
First of all, the most useful method nowadays and the new trend in the teaching process is making the students works together. On the one hand, it is the best incentive to students by generation up to date or fabulous ideas. And the vivid example when I was in the school I worked with my colleagues on biology class and we designed a sample that talked about cellular respiration, for this effort we got the highest mark in the class.
Furthermore, the innovative thinking start by sharing the idea or what is known the brainstorming, and the recent proven scientific statistic indicate that all the perfect ideas come with working together due to the students come from different perspective or different culture so the student who is come from the rural areas has ideas different from the student how is com from the urban regions. For instance, I am from countryside and I know more about the simple life and how we can use every things many times. On the other hand, my best friend comes from a big city and she knows more how to use the internet. So, we complete each other. In contrast, that the students when they work alone they cannot overcome all the information.
In conclusion, I think my view I strong and solid enough to clarify all the previous reasons that I mentioned it above, and i believe that working the pupils in groups is the best way to creates unique projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- tpo34 60
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 55
- tpo 26 75
- The following is a memorandum written by the director of personnel to the president of the Cedar Corporation. "It would be a mistake to rehire the Good-Taste Company to supply the food in our employee cafeteria next year. It is the second most expensive 29
- Claim: Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students.Reason: College students—like people in general—prefer to follow directions rat 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... reasons that I mentioned it above, and i believe that working the pupils in grou...
^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he best way to creates unique projects.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65558912387 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53914147644 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555891238671 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.3258359251 48.9658058833 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224050175628 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800486387894 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767329188839 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124475918519 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322942260472 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.