Do you agree or disagree?
When teacher assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Even though many scholars and some of the people argue as if it is a general truth that students will take more successful results and consequences of their projects and plans, if they work on project individually, I firmly recommend that teacher should prepare and force students to work on a same project as a team-work for improving their communication skills and take more experiences and abilities for their future job. And believe it or not, in modern and complex societies, community’s skills is necessary for every person. I will elaborate my idea with significant reasons in the following paragraphs.
One of the meaningful reasons coming to my mind at first is that if teachers want to witness a progressive and socially upcoming generation, they should encourage students and authorities to also focus on team-works rather than just work alone on a project. As a matter of fact, when students work with each other on a same project, not only they do their task completely, but also they learn who behave and act in groups well. As an example, my professor in university used to give her students group studies and I learn to be responsible for my work and also members of group have excellent relationship. Let’s look at a case study that should make things clear. Some years ago, some of my teachers conducted an experiment in most of their students related by team-works and considered it’s data, actually they achieve remarkable results that students learn how manage and control their time and also how share their opinions and ideas with each other.
Another my remarkable reason is that today companies apply people who have more skills and experiences related to their field. Universities and educational centers are great places where student can obtain this abilities by work with each other, of course on a same projects. For instance, my major in university is environmental pollutions, I used to work on many projects with my friends such as water, soil and wastewater sampling, and I can find job easily than another my friends who work alone.
As a result, as reasons mentioned above, I strongly recommend students improving and enhancing their future job conditions by principle in communications such as team-works and take better experiences and skills when they work with each other on some same projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- “Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.” 60
- integrated essay TPO13 78
- Do you agree or disagree?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
- integrated essay TPO15 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
Even though many scholars and some of the people argue as if it is a general trut...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, so, well, for instance, of course, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06426735219 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86839239691 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506426735219 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.3155395137 48.9658058833 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.166666667 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4166666667 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292848558259 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112357039644 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891241971343 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193619246488 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504747371608 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.