Discussion the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness.
In recent years, there have been numerous attempts to define and measure happiness in various contexts and pertaining to a wide range of disciplines. Studies show that each person will define their happiness in different ways. There are a number of reasons behind this point of view and how to people satisfy themselves.
The majority of convincing reasons associated with this phenomenon. Young and elderly people are actually experiencing completely different emotions when they say they are well-being, so generations feel happiness in different ways which are the hugely significant reason. In other words, young people generally further interested in the future and they are better likely to associate happiness with excitement. Contrarily, elderly people place a higher value on the present, so contentment tends to be a greater source of happiness and they become longer likely to associate happiness with peacefulness.
It is undeniable that it seems almost impossible to offer a precise definition of happiness. The bulk of people would agree that there are several basic preconditions to achieving it. However, in somebody’s opinion, happiness is not an individual but a collective state, it depends on positive, mutually fulfilling, mutually complementing human relationships. Thus, we cannot obtain happiness for ourselves directly, we can only provide it to one another. Notwithstanding, in order to obtain happiness, we need a unique, mutually supportive environment where people commit to trying providing each other with happiness.
In conclusion, age differences are the primarily important for explaining why people have different definitions of happiness. Moreover, occasionally, happiness cannot be achieved on its own, it has to be the exchange between people and people.
- Wheat Exports from 1985 to 1990 (in million tonnes) 78
- A HISTORY OF TWO TOWNS 11
- Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them be 84
- Oil use of major consumers in millions barrels per day 73
- A HISTORY OF TWO TOWNS 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67037037037 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18769281135 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.046782809 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4071946669 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117742485706 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621274726852 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221026097814 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037675622471 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.