You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph illustrates the information about how many goods were transported in the UK over a twenty-eight year period from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that the road transportation was the most preferred route and the pipeline remained the least popular choice throughout the period in the question.
As regards, road and pipeline transportations, in 1974, they stood at approximately 70 and 5 million tonnes respectively. While the road transportation experienced some fluctuations until 1994, pipeline saw a gradual growth to roughly around 18 million tonnes from 1974 to 1982. Despite the variation, there was then a sharp rise in the road transportation, finishing the final year at around 100 million tonnes. However, for pipeline, the transportation remained stable at around 18 million tonnes from 1982 to 1992. Subsequently, the amount of goods rose over the next two years (1994), at which point the number levelled off at just over 20 million tonnes for the remaining term.
As for water and rail transportations in 1974, both of them began at a virtually similar level of between 39 and 40 million tonnes. But from 1978, both of them followed opposite trends. Even though the transportation via water increased, the amount failed to overcome 60 million tonnes for a considerable period (1978-2000). Ultimately, the total increased rapidly to 62 million tonnes in 2002. Regarding the rail transportation, having experienced a substantial decline down to 1994, after that the amount went up to 40 million tonnes, which was exactly similar to 1974.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- The pie charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Oman and Spain in 2005 and projections for 2055 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 96
- TOPIC In many countries woman no longer feel the need to get married Some people believe that this is because woman are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring To what extent do you agree 65
- Essay topics: The continued rise in the world’s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time.What are the causes of this continued rise?Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity? 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Need some comparisons, from the topic: 'make comparisons where relevant.'
read a sample:
https://www.testbig.com/ielts-essays/you-should-spend-about-20-minutes-…
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 253 200
No. of Characters: 1283 1000
No. of Different Words: 135 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.988 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.071 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.022 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 64 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.251 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.409 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.62 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.162 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, so, then, while, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2371541502 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11752237735 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6185290074 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.416666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125329047883 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533815950188 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583306765858 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101288994249 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738630411462 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.