The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table compares with the number of wanderers in five different regions in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 correspondingly.
Overall, it can be seen that the net quantity of tourists soared significantly. Another notable feature is that Europe outstripped the rest even though all zones witnessed a rise in the figure.
In 1990, Europe was the top most favourite destination with 280.2 million visitors, while Middle East was the least preferred place with 9.8 million. There was a gradual swell in the amount each year for both parts finishing at 400.2 (Europe) and 15.8 (Middle East) in 2005, the latter being far lower than former. The United States was the second most popular area at 80.5 million in the beginning year. There was a rapid growth to 112.5 in 1995; the subsequent years experienced a steady swell to 113.2 million in the end of the term.
Asia and Pacific stood at 60.2 million as a 3rd favoured place followed by a sharp rise year on year to 135.8 million by 2005. In contrast, there was just a progressive increasing trend yearly for Africa from 18.2 to 28.7. When it comes to total, 1990 at 448.9 million was nowhere near as in demand as 2005 with 693.7 million guests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-17 | mirascarlett | 93 | view |
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 85
- Bar Chart 1: Number of Marriage and Divorces in the USA 1970-2000Bar Chart 2: Marital status of adult Americans, 1970 and 2000 79
- Some people decide to start their own business instead of working for a company or organization.Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages?Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 61
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
The table compares with the number of wanderers in five different regions in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 correspondingly.
The table compares the number of wanderers in five different regions in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 correspondingly.
correct 'compares with':
'A compares with B'
'compares A with B'
for example:
It remains to be seen how outcomes will compare with conventional approaches.
who can compare with her.
compare British prices with those in other countries.
flaws:
'compare' is not used properly.
There is a drop down for America from 118.2 to 113.2, the only country declined across all countries.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 210 200
No. of Characters: 962 1000
No. of Different Words: 129 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.581 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.374 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 39 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.899 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.378 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 113.2 million in the end of the term. Asia and Pacific stood at 60.2 million a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72857142857 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44980909988 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9165699921 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142043879272 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626895783954 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441737349682 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947830061555 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501048760991 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.