The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.

The given charts represents data from a survey of adult education. The shown chart compares reasons why people want to study while the pie chart provides informations how should be the cost of education divided between individuals, taxpayer and employer. It is clear from the chart that main reason why people decided to study is interest in subject while meeting new people has a minimal importance. People think that main cost of education should be paid by students.

According to the provided data, interest in subject and gain qualification are the significant reasons for adult students with similar percentage 40 per cent and about thirty-eight per cent respectively. Slightly more than twenty percent respondents think, that further study can help them in current job. It could be noticed that only nine percent of adult students decided study to meet a new people.

As shown in the illustration, forty per cent of working students agree to pay cost of education. Similar trend is shown for employer when thirty-five per cent of students want their employer pay for the education. Only 25 per cent of students believe taxpayer to pay for each course.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...n reason why people decided to study is interest in subject while meeting new people has...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09947643979 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70772261116 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3379973672 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272948768676 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119603572628 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102893449156 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181368070933 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165672836294 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.