Nowadays, purchasing goods online become more popular than ever. This essay will discuss its impact to modern society and environment supported with examples.
In current computerised era, for many individuals, buying stuff from comfort of their house or office exceeding sells in regular stores. People have access to wide range of goods from different markets across the globe. On the other hand, this popular trend might have negative impact to society and wellbeing. For example, people who buy all products through online shopping spend most of the time behind the screen of their computer sitting on the chair. Due to the lack of movement, their body fat, cholesterol and chance of having cardiac disease rapidly increasing. Moreover, purchasing goods online involves only non-human contact and should have negative impact to mental health. People will lose their adaptability to interact with strangers as they have been used to talk to sale personnel.
Secondly, online shopping increase demand to shipping companies, what cause more exhale fumes into our environment. As many parcels are despatched every day as more planes or trucks are in operation and polluting atmosphere. Casual shopping in malls or small shops reduce amount of oxides exhausted from delivery trucks and planes, because wide range of products is delivered just into once place and not to individual household or office.
To sum up, regular shopping has positive impact to our physical and mental health as the environment. Shopping in shopping centres make people move, interact with others and reduce pollution of environment by delivery all goods to main point.
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 78
- Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extend do you agree? 11
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 78
- The table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela, 1999. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt by delivery all goods to main point.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3861003861 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54086324833 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6418998395 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221544671814 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693711341343 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490891608303 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121540022229 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130539173394 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.