Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, due to the technological advancements, there is an increase in the number of people who work without coming to a company. However, it is a controversial issue that neither or not the employers have benefits with this kind of employees? From my perspective, I strongly believe that they will have because of the following reasons.
Firstly, the owner will economy a remarkable amount of money in order to invest in different fields. This is because that they do not need to spend money on renting an office as well as paying domestic expenses. To illustrate, a recent research showed that a company run without an office can economy at least 20% of the monthly spendings. There is an impressive number that people should consider when they want to start a business.
Secondly, this kind of work could improve work efficiency. To be specific, it is more convenient for employees to work in a familiar location and they will be more conscientious. Moreover, working without going to a company is an advantage that can attract numerous qualified employees from various nations in the world. They play a key role to boost fastly the development of companies.
It is not to say that there are no disadvantages in this kind of work. It could pose a threat to the security of companies such as the penetration of oppositions or hackers, who could make a serious destruction to a company. Nevertheless, these risks could be prevented by intelligent management.
In conclusion, working at home brings benefits to both employers and employees. This kind of work will be more popular due to the advancement of high technology so the workers should prepare for it in order to improve their chances in job markets.
- The energy use in six fields of Australian household as well as fumes which result from this process. 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs. What extent do you agree? 56
- greenhouse 11
- The charts below show proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- Total time of phone calls 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...t is a controversial issue that neither or not the employers have benefits with th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, at least, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91379310345 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97532659905 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6044275973 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0625 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167508356927 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556248639627 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470367944686 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948705680676 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453269396853 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.