The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
According to given charts, the first diagram represents energy consumption for an average household in Australia and the second chart illustrates the role of each household equipment in producing greenhouse gas. There are some highlighted facts can be driven by analyzing the pictures.
Taking a look at the first pie-chart, energy consumption diagram reveals that the most percentage of energy is being consumed for heating and water heating in next step. while cooling and lighting have nominal shares of 2% and 4% respectively. Moreover, there are other appliances which account for 15% of energy usage in a typical domestic house in Australia.
Keeping these in mind, the second pie-chart reveals that water heating with constitutes a substantial share of green gas production. Following that, other appliances are the next Pollutant. Although other types of equipment not listed explicitly, play a substantial role in greenhouse gas emission. same as the first diagram, water heating placed in the second step of pollution emission. while heating which consumes a lot of power emits a moderate percentage of emission into the air. Moreover, cooling and lighting, have least shares of both energy consumption and greenhouse gas production.
to put in a nutshell, there isn't any straight and clear correlation between the amount of energy consumption by each device and its contamination emission. Finally, we can conclude that we need to find a solution for water heating process from the economic and environmental point of view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | sana_em | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...heating and water heating in next step. while cooling and lighting have nominal share...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a typical domestic house in Australia. Keeping these in mind, the second pie-ch...
^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Same
...antial role in greenhouse gas emission. same as the first diagram, water heating pla...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... the second step of pollution emission. while heating which consumes a lot of power e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the second step of pollution emission. while heating which consumes a lot of power e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the least'.
Suggestion: have the least
...he air. Moreover, cooling and lighting, have least shares of both energy consumption and g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ption and greenhouse gas production. to put in a nutshell, there isnt any strai...
^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...duction. to put in a nutshell, there isnt any straight and clear correlation betw...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41493775934 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91747574867 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564315352697 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.531908315 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.384615385 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233392011028 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750108502245 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753176759752 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148329949958 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679192519474 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.