Based on the passage the silver coin attributed to eleventh century, which was found at a Native American Archaeological site could not be considerd as an original historical evidence. Conversely, the professor rules our all reasones claimed in the passage and recounts the coin is not fake. She brings up three reasons to call the authors notion about inaccuracy of contact of the Norse to Native American people.
First, she asserts that many other objects were found from different times in the Archaeological site of Native Americans. She believes that in that times Native American traveled long distances and collected intriguing things and brought them back to their place. This directly rejects the first theory mentioned in the passage about far distances of Norse with Native American people.
Moreover, The reading passage points out that, no other coin was found and this means that Norse people didng bring any coin with them. The professor refutes this speculation and continues that, if no more coin were found in the site,this does not necessarily means that they did not brought any coin with them. She adds that when the Norse people wanted to back to their homeland, the have packed their things and their coins were also packed.
Finally, she mentions that Native American people was attracted by beautiful objects, for instance neckless. Hence, Native American traded their things with beatiful properties belonged to Norse people, even if they didnt know real value of it. Besides, the silver coin is shiny and intriguing and could persuade Native American to exchange their things with Norse explorers. Again the professor rebuts this last idea of the author about Native American's lack of knowledge about the silver coin.
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular. Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 83
- TPO 52 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation. 90
- TPO 44 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...She brings up three reasons to call the authors notion about inaccuracy of contact of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the Norse to Native American people. First, she asserts that many other objec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
..., if no more coin were found in the site,this does not necessarily means that they di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...d in the site,this does not necessarily means that they did not brought any coin with...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...not necessarily means that they did not brought any coin with them. She adds that when ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... belonged to Norse people, even if they didnt know real value of it. Besides, the sil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21554770318 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41011159292 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533568904594 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1583862869 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451314154153 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172687890032 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711553265001 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286083578959 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496978145091 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.