Recently, the phenomenon of over packing and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the producer is responsible for over packing and should avoid it, this issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of people. I am inclined to believe that the producer should not over pack products, and I will analyze this throughout this essay.
Firstly, over packing products can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that customer attraction, as well as extra packing, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of over packing on customer attraction. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both less amount of environmentally harmful substances and avoiding over packing apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of fast paced-technology, extra packing might increase the consequences of more garbage production. Moreover, the fundamental essence of adding more harmful substances to environment emphasizes the significance of an increase n global warning. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted in a prestigious university asserted that the downside of over packing correlates negatively with environmental problems. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of avoiding the over packing.
To conclude, while there are many compelling arguments on both sides the benefits of avoiding the over packing by the producer far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of using a normal packing algorithm prove the significance of less harmful chemicals but also pinpoint its lower price implications.
- Big companies 88
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
- Big companies 11
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- Green house gas 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...was a student at university I undertook a research to investigate the likelihood of over p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35907335907 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06751836306 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617760617761 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6554401806 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229079280261 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791520505442 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453166669615 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130239179539 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258663194943 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.