Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “who is the responsible for this crisis the government or individuals?”. It is a widely held view that the function of the government to diminish the pollution is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the government plays a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition to address the pollution problem. To put into consideration, I express some reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the eco-friendly fuels must be replaced detrimental fossil fuels. Secondly, it can be argued that the government is in charge of encouraging people to leave their defective cars and use the comprehensive transport system. In addition to this information, the beneficial loans must be offered to factories to relocate to less beautiful areas in order to address the side effects of pollution on the destruction of the ozone layer and health problem.
However, there is no doubt that the environment contaminant provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that it is not rational to lay the blame for environmental pollution on just the government. Moreover, it is quite clear that individuals are responsible to contribute to eliminate this crisis by using public transport system instead of the private car as well to participate in the educational session to raise their public awareness about damaging the consequence of environmental pollution.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree the responsibility of the government to decrease environmental pollution must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 80
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to developing countries. This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in developed countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 80
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34935897436 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27619764201 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1268304 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174764423271 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663370914167 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612447975637 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105517834539 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284101889799 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.