For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of providing discount by companies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of offering the discount to potential buyers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that suggesting discount to consumers with reasonable price can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, presenting products with the discount can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of a fair price, As well as a quick sale, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of offering the discount on encouraging potential buyers for purchasing goods. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both discount rate and covering the basic needs apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, free offers for shopping might increase the consequence of special discount. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the durability of goods would relate to this reality that the demerits of discount price pertain to the lack of quality of products. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of tricky discounts is correlated negatively with misleading offers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of boosting the revenue of companies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of offering discount by company far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a reasonable price prove the significance of the popularity of the brand, but also pinpoint practical implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51546391753 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13632955882 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3054423544 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122427305494 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431560326816 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276122387997 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714712169436 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00970988992405 0.0609392437508 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.