Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example.
Nowadays, the extra packaging of products has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, Which leads to a moot question “whether the government is responsible for over packaging or not?”. It is a widely held view that appropriate packaging is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that both consumers and the producers must avoid extra packaging of products.
To begin with, it is a common belief that packaging the products plays a vital role in the world of business. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the durability of products will be increased as well they are less likely exposed to detrimental rays or contamination of the environment. Secondly, it can be argued that an extensive range of people are attracted by amazing packaging and the companies will be able to raise their sells, revenue, and income capacity. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that a wide variety of companies use this strategy to appeal their potential buyers and introduce the products.
However, over-packaging provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that extra packaging makes the water and natural environment polluted. Moreover, it is quite clear that the majority of packages are more likely flashy and trick in order to tempt customers to purchase the products without knowing them. A very tangible example to illustrate would be India that people are suffering from over packaging of products.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that over packaging in order must be avoided by both the producer and potential customers. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | greatrin | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sidra018 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | ajayvermaETP | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 84
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples. 85
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Do you agree with involving employees in decision making process? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... extra packaging of products has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28378378378 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96516172847 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6310513173 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246158243735 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826019247974 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672180893999 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151589090912 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804872286145 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.