People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
As the author claims that the people who make their decisions on the basis of the emotions and provide justification afterward by linking it with logic are poor decision makers. Author have not mentioned that whether those are entirely based on emotions or not, but assuming that in here, following are some points which will bolster the author's present claim.
Firstly, as human is a social animal so we think about people surrounding all the time involuntarily. The extent may differ from one person to other, depending on their nature and thoughts, but every single of us have place for emotions. Not only humans, animals like monkeys, cats, birds etc. all think about their loved ones all the time. This care reflects emotions. We tend to become bias towards our loved ones and let emotion distort our decision. That decision might seem correct to us due to wellness thought for closed one in the decision, but that decision may be unsound for others.
Secondly, some decision requires to think completely and wholly with proper analysis. For example, the duty of court judge is to listen the case without any intervention of emotion. Imagine if a court judge starts giving out decision on the basis of his/her emotions, what would be the results. Even if he/she applies logic afterwards, will that be considered as a good judgement. It may also happen that public start criticizing him for its decisions.
Thirdly, adding the decision with logic afterwards only results is making the decision more presentable and less prone to self rationalizing thoughts. Sometimes, we make a decision, we make a decision solely for our benefit, then we put some layers of logic on top of that just to make ourselves happy or content about the decision that we did not make it as selfish decision. Here emotions of keeping self first is influencing the decision. Though it is quite acceptable to think about self wellness. But that would lead to a good decision will be difficult to say.
In conclusion, the author's claims stands strong as points mentioned above are supporting it. It implies that one poor decision maker let his/her emotion to take control of the decision which is not right. However, using no emotion in decision cannot be considered as good decision as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 29
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 40
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thinking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: thinking
...rs. Secondly, some decision requires to think completely and wholly with proper analy...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...self first is influencing the decision. Though it is quite acceptable to think about s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94010416667 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54697485106 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5390625 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6869310024 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2272727273 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433881095519 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112707211911 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147674843346 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255116426077 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126944813303 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.