The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
The graph shows the different levels of science studies enrolled by people from Malaysia and Singapore.
It can be observed that the percentage of people studying science in these two countries decrease as the level get higher. In fact, the greatest one is related to those who did not get any qualification in science (65% in Malaysia and 60% in Singapore).
More people from Malaysia is found carrying through school leaving exams (35%) than people from Singapore (30%). However, this situation suffers a change when the bachelor’s degree is regarded, placing Singaporean people in the lead (20%) followed by Malaysian people, who held a percentage of 10%. As for master’s degrees, the both of the countries have the same amount of people studying it (4%).
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Diagram about the production of deep fried salted peanuts 64
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, as for, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 640.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 125.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.34370152488 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83493633085 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6895978791 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180144471796 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862154388267 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285710479009 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120820231735 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242725376057 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.