The line chart shows the total spending of five different categories, in percentage, in a European country from 1960 to 2000
The provided line chart illustrates the total payment of five various items, in percentage term, in a European nation between 1960 and 2000.
As can be seen from the line graph, the expense on clothing was the least expense. With regard to clothing, starting at about 5% in 1960, the percentage went down approximately 3% in 1980 and then the trend was remained stable over the next twenty years. In 2000, there was a slight growth to around 1%.
When it comes to food, beginning at about 34% in 1960, the proportion of transport payments declined suddenly and then the trend was progressive decline to more than 5% in 2000.
With respect to leisure and transport, with a starting point of 10% in 1960, the leisure trend rose faster than the transport trend almost 5% over the next four decades. By contrast, the rate of fuel slowly went down from 2% in 2000.
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- The line chart shows the total spending of five different categories, in percentage, in a European country from 1960 to 2000 61
- The chart below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Asbhy and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, with regard to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71895424837 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40734135695 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4277777717 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195232090971 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976814134919 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899539900818 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132789398205 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101853466852 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.