The line chart shows the total spending of five different categories, in percentage, in a European country from 1960 to 2000
The provided line chart illustrates the total payment of five various items, in percentage term, in a European nation between 1960 and 2000.
As can be seen from the line graph, the expense on clothing was the least expense. With regard to clothing, starting at about 5% in 1960, the percentage went down approximately 3% in 1980 and then the trend was remained stable over the next twenty years. In 2000, there was a slight growth to around 1%.
When it comes to food, beginning at about 34% in 1960, the proportion of transport payments declined suddenly and then the trend was progressive decline to more than 5% in 2000.
With respect to leisure and transport, with a starting point of 10% in 1960, the leisure trend rose faster than the transport trend almost 5% over the next four decades. By contrast, the rate of fuel slowly went down from 2% in 2000.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, with regard to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71895424837 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40734135695 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4277777717 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195232090971 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976814134919 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899539900818 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132789398205 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101853466852 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.