More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work. What will be the consequences of this? What solutions can you offer?
Nowadays, the constantly growing number of people from non-urban areas are leaving for cities because of the possibilities to find a better job there. This process has a crucial influence on the further development of both country-side and cities. There are a number solutions which should be implemented to deal with the issue.
Firstly, though controlled migration from rural areas brings about improved employment opportunities standards of living, technological and infrastructural advancement, it also leads to overcrowding, which in turns contributes to fierce competition and the rise of unemployment, elevates prices for housing and leads to the spread of slums, where people suffer from sanitation problems, violence, drug abuse and crime.
However, governments may lessen the negative effects of urbanization by tourism promotion and encouraging private investments to the sphere of natural resources utilization which would help create more job opportunities. Moreover, smart growth technologies should be advocated, that is sustainable use of world’s resources, renewable energy, and environmentally friendly materials. On the other hand, investments should also be attracted to the rural areas. The main objective here is not only to create job opportunities but also to further develop the agricultural sector of economy which is interrelated with human well-being. Besides, young people might be subsidized while studying at the universities if they agree to work afterwards at the agricultural enterprises in the area.
In conclusion, considering the fact that people have the urge of migrating to the areas with better life prospects, efforts should be made in order to improve and control the level of living conditions and development in different aspects of life in both urban and non-urban areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-23 | Skinny | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-19 | Parneetkor | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-19 | Parneetkor | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | Amarpreet Singh | 86 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | Sahil Garg | 73 | view |
Comments
Well written ... i wana know
Well written ... i wana know how this e grader works ?? Will wait for ur reply
Machine learning technologies
Machine learning technologies are used for e-grader, and the scores are compared to the average performance by other users.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...te investments to the sphere of natural resources utilization which would help create mor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74264705882 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.269769523 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1957660387 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.2 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139725041051 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513858666623 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256440828245 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790302611287 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270936562975 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.