Recently, most employers are more interested in their employees qualification than their personal qualities. In my view, it is not so positive approach to put emphasis only on qualification, further having diversity of skill will help the organization to grow healthy.
Companies approach of giving priority to employes qualification do bring back many benifits. Firstly, most companies believe that a good degree enables this staff to be more productive. the reason for such a belief is that, if they hire a less qualified person for a perticular job, they have to invest more amount of time and m...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: dhruv546
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 67
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this good or bad thing. 73
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment in your letter.• Describe the problem with the equipment• Explain how this problem is affecting 36
- Employers nowadays put more emphasis on social skills Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Nowadays people move from one country to the other for finding jobs Some people think children of these families suffer because of this while others think it is helpful for them Discuss both views and give your opinion 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ables this staff to be more productive. the reason for such a belief is that, if th...
^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'acquiring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: acquiring
...e and money on that candidates training to acquire the required skill. This approach is no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...r an IAS officer. In orfer to do these jobs candidate spend years to master the ski...
^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...can be best seen in case of management. people who are good at managing people and cap...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... are the one with real-life experience. this is due to the fact that people with deg...
^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'a better'.
Suggestion: a better
...age of it. This gives their counterpart a better a better edge. To sum up, it is good to hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. This gives their counterpart a better a better edge. To sum up, it is goo...
^^
Line 8, column 128, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...perienced people. Moreover, in my view, i am quiet positive about the companies i...
^
Line 8, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... my view, i am quiet positive about the companies ideology of seeking for employees with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng for employees with good qualification
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, such as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9928057554 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95595919057 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8039709699 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6470588235 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199815388835 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604898377431 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037340935274 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117893383579 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473467509279 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.