The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.

The given illustrations presents the number of annual transactions including rentals and sales in various discipline of films such as rentals, VHS sales, DVD sales and blue-ray sales over the period of 9 years from 2002 until 2011.

Overall, It can be observed from the chart that blue ray and DVD have picked up from It's value over the 9 years period compared to initial values. However, rentals and VHS have gone down in number for the same period of time.

To begin, Initially the number of DVD sales was around 50,000 in the year 2002 while of the blue ray it was completely zero. After that, the following year, the value of DVD sales rose up sharply until 2005, but in regard to blue ray it is almost zero in value up to 2006.Then, while reaching in 2006 we can see steady growth in DVD sales reaching to 2007 the blue ray sales starts making it's pace a bit high from previous zero value. Finally, DVD sales starts decreasing slowly by small number up to 2011, conversely in blue ray sales, It linearly picked up to about 15000 in 2011.

On the other hand, rentals and VHS are initially in good number of almost 180,000 and 80,000 respectively in the year 2002 while moving on we can see that there has been small decrease in number up to in 2005. After that, the VHS sales becomes completely zero and rentals also does not stop declining it's value and ultimately reach value around 70000 in 20011.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: BLU_RAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Blu-ray'?
Suggestion: Blu-ray
...ch as rentals, VHS sales, DVD sales and blue-ray sales over the period of 9 years from 2...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: down
...ues. However, rentals and VHS have gone down in number for the same period of time. To begi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...S have gone down in number for the same period of time. To begin, Initially the number of D...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...y it is almost zero in value up to 2006.Then, while reaching in 2006 we can see stea...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, however, so, then, while, such as, in regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5234375 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22543831269 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4921875 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5495188732 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.75 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223608657412 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116116398475 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804331360137 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168192085818 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898338559889 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.