1. Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author claims that woven baskets are not particular to palea. To support the conclusion, he cites the various evidence found by archaeologists recently. Although this evidence appears to bolster the author's author’s arguments, a meticulous analysis will show otherwise. So the author needs to cite the following specific evidence to make the argument more sound: a picture that compares the pattern of two baskets. Whether they only way for the people in paella to go to the lithos is by crossing the brimming river by boat. Statistics data that indicates the origin of the people in lithos.
First, the picture that compared these two oven baskets that one found in lithe while others found in Palea will demonstrate the similarities between them. This specific evidence will strengthen or weaken the argument depending on what the picture indicates.Base on the pictures, if two baskets are indeed very similar, then it will strengthen the argument. However, if the opposite is found then it will not support the argument.
Secondly, the author needs to clarify that whether crossing the Brim river is by boat is only one method to get into the lithos. This evidence, again, can go either direction. If crossing the Brim river is only by boat, then it strengthens the argument, however, there are any plausible routes, then the argument is not supported. Thus, it”s entirely possible that they can cross the Brim river in winter when the river is frozen or during the drought when the water is little. Hence, people can cross the river easily without any tools to help.
Last but not least, if there are other alternative routes for the palea people to get into the city of lithos, the author must provide the statistic data that indicated the origin of the people in lithos.
In sum, the author needs to provide more specific evidence such as a picture that compares the pattern of two baskets. The possible ways for the people of palea to go to the lithos and statistic data that indicates the origin of people in lithos. Without this specific evidence, the author can't convince me of the claim.
- Claim Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience Reason People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes 58
- Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 1 Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- 1 Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archae 60
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 1 Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 58
- Important truths begin as outrageous or at least uncomfortable attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 358 350
No. of Characters: 1705 1500
No. of Different Words: 155 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.35 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.763 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.366 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.089 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.347 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Base
...depending on what the picture indicates.Base on the pictures, if two baskets are ind...
^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
... the argument is not supported. Thus, it”s entirely possible that they can cross ...
^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: NO_SPACE_CLOSING_QUOTE[1]
Message: There should be a space after a closing quote.
Suggestion: ” s
... the argument is not supported. Thus, it”s entirely possible that they can cross t...
^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hout this specific evidence, the author cant convince me of the claim.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 357.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.918767507 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50531060364 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439775910364 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2931807475 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.70786347227 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105228337245 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418029518898 0.0743258471296 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419668335089 0.0701772020484 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643380624315 0.128457276422 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219214296676 0.0628817314937 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.