Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. But last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. A better alternative is to add a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, and so would reduce rush-hour traffic rather thans fostering an increase."
With the information provided, the assumption leading to conclusion remains unfounded. This argument is well presented yet far-fetched. This assumption claims that commuters complain that heavy traffic on Blue Highway has leaded to increasing their commuting time. Furthermore, they selected several solutions for this event such as adding an additional lane, adding a bicycle lane to the highway. Hence the conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying the author's assumptions is that adding a bicycle lane to highway which would be a great approach for this challenge. Nevertheless, he fails to preclude other possibility that this solution would not be practical for all due to the fact that majority of people utilize bicycle as a recreation not transportation. As a matter of fact, they may not willing to use bicycle for transportation owing to inclement weather. Beside, other believes that using bicycle would be time consuming without a shadow of doubt.
Furthermore, the author of the assumption should answer this question that what is a major traffic jam on Green Highway. However, he fails to take other possible reason into account that it might be possible that others factor like repairer works on the roads that might have developed potholes. In fact, answering this question is greatly vital that are Blue and Green highway similar condition? Perhaps their geographical situation and density population are disparate each other. Want of such prudent answers to make other assumption full of holes. So. to reinforce the argument the author should have provided information about position both highway, other multiple aspect for traffic congestion which is considerably imperative.
Moreover, the author of the statement has suggested using bicycle is not prudent due to several point like, distance. We all know that distance has a pivotal role in reaching to destination. In fact, some paths are considerably long, cyclists leading to exhaustion even before reaching their destination. Some days, whether is cold or highly hot. It became arduous for rider to commute is such an extreme climate. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have provided information about that commuting through bicycle is feasible or not.
In short, as discussed, this conclusion cannot be tenable. The author of the statement should have discussed about detail of both highway, further investigation about main reason for heavy traffic. Moreover, whether using bicycle is feasible for all or not which last point is an indispensable criteria. On the other hand to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observation method. After all, feckless attempt with a fallible method could be noting a fool's errand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | p30kh40 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Nithin Narla | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | PRABINADHIKARI45 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Yongrok_Jeong | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | OliverRaab | 55 | view |
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 80
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 16
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: ADD_AN_ADDITIONAL[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'adding a lane'.
Suggestion: adding a lane
...everal solutions for this event such as adding an additional lane, adding a bicycle lane to the highway. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
..., adding a bicycle lane to the highway. Hence the conclusion is ill-founded. The p...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...ot which last point is an indispensable criteria. On the other hand to make a rigid conc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
...ith a fallible method could be noting a fools errand.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, after all, in fact, in short, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 16.3942115768 189% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 427.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42154566745 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85420050437 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 204.123752495 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515222482436 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2807532843 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0384615385 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4230769231 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57692307692 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174229196599 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494335011986 0.0743258471296 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846841909054 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110501439135 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089932477449 0.0628817314937 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 98.500998004 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.