The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing
prices in Maple County.
The Argument which is given by the council of maple country is that they are concerned about the overdeveloped country as well as they want to put a restriction on the new housing prices in the Maple Country. But, the assumptions which are provided here is not relevant and doesn't lead to a conclusion that if they put restriction the prices of housing in the country increase. The Council needs to provide more significant data and also they are not sure that this measure will lead to a conclusion.There are too many loopholes in the assumptions and below are the respective illustrations.
The major reason for the significant increase in the pricing of housing in the maple country they have compared with the ten years ago in the chest country. First of all,the places are different so the maple country cannot be compared with the chestnut country. Moreover, they are comparing with the ten years ago measures and as we know that old records can't be relevant data to conclude. Thus, the comparison between the two similar situations will lead to nullifying the assumption and if the assumption is not relevant the conclusion is flawed.
The second reason they are provided here is that the council are concerned that they want to put some restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing and compared with pine country. So, the comparison between the same scenarios is not true, because both the countries are different and maybe it depends on which area this country is situated. So, According to the area the housing prices are doubled in fifteen years ago and also this is not a current comparison because what would happen fifteen years ago can't be the same in current time. Therefore, the comparison which is provided here is also not considered to be true and this is also a flawed assumption.
Lastly, the assumptions which are provided here is completely flawed and doesn't lead to a relevant conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | samramjam12345 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 63 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had litt 43
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by li 50
- Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 332 350
No. of Characters: 1570 1500
No. of Different Words: 127 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.269 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.729 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.62 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.65 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.917 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.41 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.616 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h are provided here is not relevant and doesnt lead to a conclusion that if they put r...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... this measure will lead to a conclusion.There are too many loopholes in the assumptio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...s ago in the chest country. First of all,the places are different so the maple count...
^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...easures and as we know that old records cant be relevant data to conclude. Thus, the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 511, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...use what would happen fifteen years ago cant be the same in current time. Therefore,...
^^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... provided here is completely flawed and doesnt lead to a relevant conclusion.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 328.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91768292683 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73698144769 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 204.123752495 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396341463415 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8797180405 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.324526521 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.70786347227 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995680776904 0.218282227539 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414863894665 0.0743258471296 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462557418158 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581620302929 0.128457276422 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463580056008 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 98.500998004 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.