Essay topics: GRE Argument:The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of Brindleburg to the city council."Two years ago, the town of Seaside Vista opened a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. Since then, the Seaside Vista Tourism Board h

Essay topics:

Essay topics: GRE Argument:

The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of Brindleburg to the city council.

"Two years ago, the town of Seaside Vista opened a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. Since then, the Seaside Vista Tourism Board has reported a 20% increase in visitors. In addition, local banks reported a steep rise in the number of new business loan applications they received this year. The amount of tax money collected by Seaside Vista has also increased, allowing the town to announce plans to improve Seaside Vista's roads and bridges. We recommend building a similar golf course and resort hotel in Brindleburg. We predict that this project will generate additional tax revenue that the city can use to fund much-needed public improvements."

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

In this memo, the mayor of Brindleburg recommends the city council to build a golf course and resort hotel in Brindleburg in order to generate additional tax revenue. His recommendation is based on several assumptions, and some questions should be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result.

To begin with, the writer should answer the question of whether there are other factors affecting the increase in visitor in the town of Seaside Vista. In the memo, he assumes that a 20% increase in visitors in the town of Seaside Vista results from building a new municipal golf course and resort hotel in the town. However, the assumption can be wrong. It is possible that the increase in the number of visitors is caused by completely different reasons, such as the city council’s action to lower the price of tour spot or holding various festivals. If so, building a new golf course and resort hotel is not responsible for an increase in visitors, and the argument will be weakened. On the contrary, there are no other factors which influence on visitors, the argument will be strengthened.

In addition, the question of whether an increase in the amount of tax money collected by Seaside Vista is attributed to the opening of a new golf course and resort hotel should be answered by the writer. He presumes that it is and that there are no other factors affecting the amount of tax. However, there may be various other factors which can make a change in the amount of tax money. For instance, more people might have currently moved in Seaside Vista or their income might have increased due to the temporally economic boom, so they might have paid more tax than previous. Therefore, if there are other factors such as mentioned above affecting the tax, the argument will lose its validity. In contrast, if there are no factors which can affect the amount of tax, except for building a golf course and resort hotel, the argument will be reinforced.

Lastly, the writer should provide the answer to the question of whether Bridenburg has similar characteristics to Seaside Vista. He supposes that both have similar characteristics, so argues that the success of the opening of a golf course and resort hotel will be successful in Brindleburg as well. However, the presumption might not be true. While Seaside Vista might have an extensive flatland and beautiful natural scenery suitable for building a golf course and resort hotel, Brindleburg may not be good for building a golf course and resort hotel due to its rugged terrain and serious environmental pollution. In such a case, Brindleburg should not build a golf course and resort hotel, and the argument will be less persuasive. On the other hand, both towns have similar characteristics, the argument will be more persuasive.

In sum, while the mayor of Brindleburg recommends the city council to build a golf course and resort hotel in Brindleburg in order to generate additional tax revenue based on several assumptions, the recommendation might be unsound due to the unsubstantiated assumptions. Therefore, he should answer the questions in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-26 helxing 82 view
2019-06-27 AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU 69 view
2019-03-09 HayHAHA 63 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...To begin with, the writer should answer the question of whether there are other factors affecting the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...t will be strengthened. In addition, the question of whether an increase in the amount of tax money ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...the writer should provide the answer to the question of whether Bridenburg has similar characteristics ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, except for, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 2260.96107784 120% => OK
No of words: 540.0 441.139720559 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01851851852 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8783616358 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.348148148148 0.468620217663 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 847.8 705.55239521 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1299870785 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.181818182 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95454545455 5.70786347227 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263553289346 0.218282227539 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954273186456 0.0743258471296 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09362008212 0.0701772020484 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171389498804 0.128457276422 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536658563616 0.0628817314937 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 540 350
No. of Characters: 2634 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.821 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.878 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.776 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 194 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 141 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 96 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.081 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.565 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5