The following appeared in a letter to the city council of Canbury from the president of Plexma Motors I am pleased that the council is considering Plexma s plans to open a new manufacturing site in Canbury next year In addition to our regular line of cars

Essay topics:

The following appeared in a letter to the city council of Canbury from the president of Plexma Motors.
"I am pleased that the council is considering Plexma`s plans to open a new manufacturing site in Canbury next year. In addition to our regular line of cars, Plexma has also begun designing and testing a line of automated self-driving vehicles. In a recent survey conducted by local media, 60 per cent of Canbury`s residents reported that they would purchase a Plexma self-driving vehicle in the future if they were confident in the vehicle's safety. We are happy to report that last summer, we tested our new line of self-driving vehicles in downtown Canbury with great success. Not only did our five tested vehicles remain accident-free for two months during testing, but in a survey conducted after testing, 90 per cent of Canbury`s residents reported that when they were downtown and our vehicles were in operation they felt very safe. Because steady demand for our self-driving vehicles will create new jobs and thereby greatly benefit Canbury`s economy as a whole, I recommend that you vote to allow Plexma to begin manufacturing and selling these vehicles in Canbury."

In the letter written by the president of Plexma Motors for the city council of Canbury, he mentions to the opening of a new manufacturing site in Canbury next year. He emphasizes the production of driverless cars. He has said that according to the survey, some residents announced that they would be willing to buy such cars, and the results of tests done on cars were successful. He has also predicted that these cars would be able to have an important role in the creation of new jobs and an economic boom. As a result, he offers the city council of Canbury to let Plexma start producing and selling such cars. The recommendation presented has some weaknesses and ambiguities that make it invalid for implementation.
At first glance, the survey has been done by the local media. The officials of the media may believe in the production of such cars, and they may be fans of Plexma Motors, so they may choose their case study from people who agree with the production of self-driving cars. Therefore, the results rendered cannot be persuasive. If the survey had been conducted by non-native researchers, it would have been more acceptable that personal ideas and biases would have not been included.
Also, there is no information about the exact number of people living in the city. He has mentioned that 60% of individuals are willing to use such cars if they are confident in the vehicles` safety. If we were aware of the number of residents, we would be better able to ensure whether the percentage presented would be acceptable compared to the total number of citizens for such a conclusion. Also, there is no information to ensure that only the local residents were asked about this subject. Additionally, it is not clear, the individuals’ opinions based on which factors have been checked.
The president of Plexma Motor has pointed out the car testing. It has been mentioned that only five numbers of self-driving cars have been tested. Are these numbers of cars enough for the validation test? Have these been chosen randomly? Have these cars been tested on different routes and weather conditions? Are the standards of automated cars equivalent to the international ones?
Moreover, the head of Plexma Motor is hopeful for job creation and economic improvement. There is no information about the price of such cars. How much money the council of Canbury must spend on the production of such cars? how the budget must be provided? If the budget should be provided from the tax given by residents, whether the economic condition of these people is good enough. The production of such cars needs some specialists to know how to work with such kinds of cars. How many people in this city have this knowledge? According to which factors the improvement of the economy in the city is ensured.
In conclusion, if the president of Plexma Motor tends to convince the city council of Canbury for the production of such cars, he has to answer all questions and tries to resolve all doubts mentioned above.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of tests done on cars were successful. He has also predicted that these cars woul...
^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
... spend on the production of such cars? how the budget must be provided? If the bud...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.6327345309 158% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 55.5748502994 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2507.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 515.0 441.139720559 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86796116505 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74465864874 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433009708738 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 19.7664670659 152% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2004968358 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5666666667 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 23.324526521 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.70786347227 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.67664670659 321% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193850929327 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567576561402 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10194872812 0.0701772020484 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113746487387 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855001695192 0.0628817314937 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 515 350
No. of Characters: 2437 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.764 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.732 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.618 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 65 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.759 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.877 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.448 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.293 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.293 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5