The argument posits a prediction of the enshrinement of Darrington college allying with an assumption of building a new cafeteria provided with a lower budget. Though the argument seems probable and credulous at first glance, the author still needs to consider an answer to some more questions to reach the conclusion. This argument could be inquisitioned further on the following basis.
The author rests his conclusion on the basis of a point that the current cafeteria is very old and serves only expensive dishes there. He hastily comes to the conclusion without ruminating about the probability of students who are thinking of the current cafeteria being old. There is no statistical information about the cafeteria being old for how many years and about the number of students who are having any problem regarding the quaint cafeteria's dishes and its cost. Before making any changes in the cafeteria there should be a proper consensus among the present students also in order to avert any type of future chaos.
This fallacious argument could also be refuted by the most pivotal point that the future students are not going to take admission in the Darrington college just by looking at the cost of cafeteria's dishes or its archaic architecture. They are going to opt for Darrington college by looking at its courses provided and the number of erudite professors it consists of. Also, by improving these salient features of the college, there is a greater number of chances that its ranking is going to ascent. He should be cognizant about the divergent fields of interest of these international students and should bring in those interests and should add them in its study curriculum. That is going to enhance the college's ranking for sure.
Also, the author recklessly comes to the conclusion of enhanced ranking and increased budget just by building a new cafeteria. He does not provide any insightful information regarding the cost required to build the new cafeteria and the cost of just maintaining the old cafeteria by bringing changes in some aspects. It is possible that the development of the new cafeteria could result in the ascendency of budget an ultimately result in being a bane for the college authorities instead of being the boon. He should first make his perspective clear about the information regarding the present budget and required budget to make these desired changes.
Considering the aforementioned argument, we can conclude that the author's stance is acute to several questioning due to a lack of empirical evidence and hence is open to debate. Before coming to the conclusion the author should reflect on the other scenarios which could boost the ranking of Darrington college and could attract more and more number of international students. He should consider the interest of international students and try to bring in those changes instead of just making changes on the basis of his personal indulgence.
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 73
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reas 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of International student affairs at Darrington College. "To better serve the international students being admitted to Darrington College, we should build a new cafeteria catering to the students at subsid 49
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East M 72
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not exactly
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 483 350
No. of Characters: 2436 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.688 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.043 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.775 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 186 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 142 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 99 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.421 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.991 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.474 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.574 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.175 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... quaint cafeterias dishes and its cost. Before making any changes in the cafeteria the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('ultimately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('result') instead of another adjective.
...ould result in the ascendency of budget an ultimately result in being a bane for the college authori...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...oned argument, we can conclude that the authors stance is acute to several questioning ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, look, regarding, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2474.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 483.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12215320911 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79437458743 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8116738063 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.210526316 119.503703932 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4210526316 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42105263158 5.70786347227 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246882638303 0.218282227539 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075513680875 0.0743258471296 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432875615508 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134171873909 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372730262166 0.0628817314937 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.