The following appeared in a newsletter to Canbury’s residents from the president of
Plexma Motors.
“I am pleased to announce that Plexma’s new manufacturing site is on schedule to open
next year. In addition to our regular line of cars, Plexma has also begun designing and
testing a line of automated self-driving vehicles. In a recent survey conducted by the
Canbury Gazette, 60 percent of residents reported that they would purchase a Plexma selfdriving
vehicle in the future if they were confident in the vehicles’ safety. We are happy to
report that last summer, we tested our new line of self-driving vehicles in downtown
Canbury with great success. Not only did our five tested vehicles remain accident-free for
two months during testing, but in a survey conducted after testing, 90 percent of
Canbury’s residents reported that when they were downtown and our vehicles were in
operation they felt very safe. Because steady demand for our self-driving vehicles will
create new jobs and thereby greatly benefit Canbury’s economy as a whole, I recommend
that you vote to allow Plexma to begin manufacturing and selling these vehicles in
Canbury when our new site opens.”
The author of the article which appeared in a newsletter from the president of plexima Motors provided weak evidence and used vague words in his/her recommendation, which calls for residents to vote for allowing plexima to begin manufacturing automated self-driving vehicles in Canbury when the company's new site opens. Not only did the he/she provide unclear evidence, but also naivly made strong assumptions, hence the argument is unpursuasive.
First, the word "recent" may have different meanings and possibilities, and the author needs to identify and specify his/her intention. moreover, the survey mentioned in the argument gives rise to many questions, such as: was the sample in the survey representative? did all of the residents take the survey?
Second, the author implied that the judgment of succuess of the vehicles was justified by its being accident free for two months. The basis of this assumption needs to be further elaborated.
Third, the author added another survey that may not be accepted as strong enough evidence for the argument. moreover, he/she stated that residents felt "safe", which is ambiguous and subjective. The author did not present the means by which the level of safety felt by residents was measured.
To conclude, various critical mistakes have been encountered in the argument that henders it equivocal thus in its current state the statement is flawed.
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 16
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children's 50
- The following appeared in a newsletter to Canbury’s residents from the president ofPlexma Motors.“I am pleased to announce that Plexma’s new manufacturing site is on schedule to opennext year. In addition to our regular line of cars, Plexma has also 33
- Teacher's Salaries Should be based on their students’ Academic Performance. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
... companys new site opens. Not only did the he/she provide unclear evidence, but also ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...ew site opens. Not only did the he/she provide unclear evidence, but also naivly made ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns, hence the argument is unpursuasive. First, the word 'recent' may h...
^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...identify and specify his/her intention. moreover, the survey mentioned in the argument g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Did
...he sample in the survey representative? did all of the residents take the survey? ...
^^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ample in the survey representative? did all of the residents take the survey? Second, t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d all of the residents take the survey? Second, the author implied that the judg...
^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umption needs to be further elaborated. Third, the author added another survey t...
^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...trong enough evidence for the argument. moreover, he/she stated that residents felt &apo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 55.5748502994 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 2260.96107784 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 221.0 441.139720559 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44343891403 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06266325709 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601809954751 0.468620217663 128% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 705.55239521 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7688666825 57.8364921388 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141720688221 0.218282227539 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479635093771 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633431575597 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065363200947 0.128457276422 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538376148581 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.