The following appeared in a note from a sedan owner to a friend Of the two top brands of cars introduced in past year Kia cars are clearly more superior to the competing Alfa cars Kia cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 50 kms p

The reasons stated in the argument are not cogent as there are some gaps that are needed to be bridged. There are some arbitrary assumptions made which are baseless, those need to be clarified properly. There should be statistical proofs for all the statements made.

It is mentioned 'in past years' the time period is not mentioned perfectly in the stated argument. Proper time period should be mentioned. The aesthetically pleasing design may be complicated to understand. The age group of people who had driven the car is unknown. It might be possible that old age groups might prefer Alfa car rather than Kia car.

Besides marketing of the Alfa may be not proper for people to feel it like a dream car. In the argument the features of both the cars are not mentioned, so it is difficult to reach the conclusion on the given information. Besides the only fuel economy of Kia car is given. Fuel economy of the Alfa car must also be given to make the proper comparison.

Besides only the advantages of Kia car are given, disadvantages of both and advantages of Alfa car must also be mentioned to understand the proper model. It may be possible that Alfa cars may have some luxurious components in it which makes the Kia car more cost-effective. It is not defined that what is the actual purpose or the use of cars. It is not mentioned that Kia car is cost-effective to whom. It may be possible that Alfa cars are often purchased by the middle-class people.

All these questions are not addressed in the stated argument. It fails to be a strong argument as there some gaps found. These gaps must be bridged with valid survey and the survey should not be latest one. These arbitrary assumptions should have proper statistical proofs having all of age groups taken into consideration.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the actual purpose or the use of cars. It is not mentioned that Kia car is cost-e...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that Kia car is cost-effective to whom. It may be possible that Alfa cars are ofte...
^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the latest'.
Suggestion: be the latest
... valid survey and the survey should not be latest one. These arbitrary assumptions should...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 313.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72843450479 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7204167986 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434504792332 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2901231132 57.8364921388 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.4761904762 119.503703932 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 23.324526521 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2380952381 5.70786347227 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266585941897 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097710784818 0.0743258471296 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101284813486 0.0701772020484 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160793529541 0.128457276422 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133523383121 0.0628817314937 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.3799401198 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.3550499002 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 12.5979740519 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the actual purpose or the use of cars. It is not mentioned that Kia car is cost-e...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that Kia car is cost-effective to whom. It may be possible that Alfa cars are ofte...
^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the latest'.
Suggestion: be the latest
... valid survey and the survey should not be latest one. These arbitrary assumptions should...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 313.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72843450479 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7204167986 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434504792332 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2901231132 57.8364921388 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.4761904762 119.503703932 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 23.324526521 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2380952381 5.70786347227 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266585941897 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097710784818 0.0743258471296 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101284813486 0.0701772020484 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160793529541 0.128457276422 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133523383121 0.0628817314937 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.3799401198 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.3550499002 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 12.5979740519 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.