The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake Houserestaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little imp

Essay topics:

The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House
restaurants.
"Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little impact on our customers.In fact, only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that an average of 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers do not distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine."

Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.

The author of the statement believes that customers of the Happy Pancake House do not differentiate butter from margarine or they use the same word “butter” to refer to both of them. This conclusion rests on the premise that when Happy pancake House restaurant shifted to use of margarine instead of butter seemingly most of the customers were comfortable with the change and they did not issued significant numbers of complaints. As the argument lacks firm evidence, the argument is open to different explanations.

First, the author relies on the lack of complaints to buttress the conclusion. There is not any guarantee that remaining 98 percent of customers who did not complain were satisfied with the change. It is possible that they abandoned the Happy Pancake for the other restaurants without bothering themselves with trivial things to issue any complaints. Furthermore, we do not know how much time pasts since the change happened. The change might happen a day ago, and still there are surges of complaints to come and it is just a matter of time that complaints be issued toward the Happy Pancake restaurant. Therefore, it would be too hasty to conclude that the impacts of the shift to margarine was not high.

Secondly, the author mentions that “many” servers reported that “a number” of customers asked for the butter did not complain when they received the margarine instead. Here the both words_ many servers and a number of customers_ are too vague to be statistically reliable. Many servers can be 10 out of a thousand of servers which equals to 1 percent of the servers which in turn would not be significant in numbers. Furthermore, “a number” of the costumers who did not complained might be 2 people while those who complained might be much more.

Finally, even if people are not making complaints this does not mean necessarily that they cannot recognize the difference between margarine and butter. These people might acquiesce to the change, and just tolerate the change because of the other options that such restaurant possesses, like being in the vicinity, offering cheaper prices, or better quality of food, and so on, the customers tolerate the change despite their reluctance toward such a change.

In short, as discussed, the argument lacks several vital evidences to support the argument and its conclusion; the rival explanations are not ruled out and thus the argument lacks any certainty to offer for readers. Therefore, the conclusion which is based on such a weak argument cannot be tenable.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-07 Mrunal 82 view
2016-12-02 naraek 50 view
2015-05-10 siamakd 45 view
2015-01-18 siamakd 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user siamakd :

Comments

There is not any guarantee
There is no any guarantee

costumers who did not complained might
costumers who did not complain might

argument 1 -- OK

argument 2 -- OK

argument 3 -- OK

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 420 350
No. of Characters: 2063 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.527 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.912 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.647 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.706 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.922 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.567 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.073 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5