It is said that every people has a different mindsets regarding taste and admiration for the same movie. Based on that, the argument is not completely true for several reasons such as reviewer's review is not guarenteed to be liked by the mass people. So, before concluding we need more evidence and information to evaluate the argument.
Firstly, previously people used to attend but over the years they stopped attending. That's the reason for the decreasing number of attendant. So, the possible reason is people lost their interest or the ticket price went out of their range and that's why they lost interest. In this regard it's really difficult to say, after hearing about the good movies, they will be back again. So, we need to know, what people think about recent movies and how well they are motivated to go for the new movies to evaluate the argument.
Secondly, reviews of the recent movies are good and those are stated by the few people who always came and did not stop coming like the others. That's one possible way to increase the percentage of good comments. Their taste can differ from the others who do not find this movies exciting and stopped coming. So, evaluating the percentage only, does not tell us the fact that people are not coming just because they are not aware of it. We need the entire data of people who used to come and review and the number of people who are coming now to watch the movie.
Finally, there is no certainty that people are not aware of the new good movies. They used to be there ones because of their interest and stopped going when they did not find it amusing. A survey is necessary for that to determine the number of people who are aware and still not interested to go.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 63
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 23
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Based on that, the argument is not completely true for several reasons such as reviewer's review is not guarenteed to be liked by the mass people.
Error: guarenteed Suggestion: guaranteed
--------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- ???
--------------------
minimum 3 arguments wanted.
-----------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1386 1500
No. of Different Words: 154 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.471 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.186 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.787 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.33 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.522 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mindset'?
Suggestion: mindset
... said that every people has a different mindsets regarding taste and admiration for the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the argument is not completely true for several reasons such as reviewers review...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... over the years they stopped attending. Thats the reason for the decreasing number of...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...icket price went out of their range and thats why they lost interest. In this regard ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...nd did not stop coming like the others. Thats one possible way to increase the percen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... differ from the others who do not find this movies exciting and stopped coming. So,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 310.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58387096774 5.12650576532 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23236294738 2.78398813304 80% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509677419355 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6716141244 57.8364921388 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8125 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.70786347227 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888753172242 0.218282227539 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319075951173 0.0743258471296 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373291674287 0.0701772020484 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516556728773 0.128457276422 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350984256783 0.0628817314937 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.5979740519 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 98.500998004 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.