Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains moderate amounts of caffeine, a stimulant that is not without side effects, including sleeplessness, irritability, and headaches. A long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those that chronic coffee drinkers, another source of caffeine, suffer. Therefore, it is important that anyone who chooses to drink green tea limit their intake to no more than two cups a day.
The author has given quite a persuasive argument here against drinking more than two cups of green tea a day. However, there are some loopholes here which need to be elaborated upon for the reader to readily agree with the final conclusion.
The author claims that that green tea contains caffeine which has quite a few side-effects. A thorough study, to back these claims, is required. The effects of caffeine may greatly vary from person-to-person depending upon genotype, eating habits, body mass and a multitude of other factors. Consequently, this argument might be completely invalid for some portions of the populace. The author needs to show that a large proportion of people have a caffeine tolerance low enough for the listed side-effects to come into the picture.
Then the author goes on to quote the results from a long-term study. It is imperative to show that the sample size for the experiment was large and diverse enough. Suppose if the sample size was of a similar age range, one could easily argue that the effects noticed are consistent only in a particular demographic and isn't a general result which could be held true for people of all ages.
Another point on which the author could be contested is that the exact number three is the limit. A plausible instance is that those who showed similar effects as chronic coffee drinkers had a much higher intake of green tea than 3 cups. Meanwhile, most people who regularly drank 3 cups seemed to have reaped many benefits of green tea without any occurence of side-effects. In this case, the author needs to give quantifiable data for the reader to draw the same conclusion as him/her.
In conclusion, the author needs to provide more specifics as well as concrete data from the studies he/she has quoted and verify that a diverse sample size was used for the study before making a premature conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | bstergios55@yahoo.com | 49 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | anirudh8860 | 57 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Shubham Bait | 63 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Nikhil Nanjappa | 69 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | jinquanw | 65 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only make our lives more complicated. 83
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation."To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the c 83
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 83
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 34
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 52
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 323 350
No. of Characters: 1522 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.239 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.712 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.558 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.533 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.578 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.58 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...nt only in a particular demographic and isnt a general result which could be held tr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 320.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.890625 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6415383036 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7543937329 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129459813567 0.218282227539 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459569782671 0.0743258471296 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620482657276 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742441175947 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047958022347 0.0628817314937 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.