Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
nistratoion of inoculations against cow flu to save lives from the disease and the possibility of death due to these routine administration. However, the argument is weak in its roots as it does not encompass speciifc evidence in support of the statement. To evaluate the argument from all angles, a set of evidences listed below is advisable.
The author states that many lives will be saved from cow flu due to routine administration of inoculations. A detailed number of lives saved by inoculations would be helpful to expand the case. If a higher number of lives are saved by the inoculation, author's case would be strengthen for need of these inoculations. To support the argument, a list of ingredients present in the inoculation and explanation of how the ingredients function against the viruses of cow flu is advisable. This would strenghten the argument as it would clearly depict the need of inoculations. On the same lines, submitting a detailed time plan that shows frequency of inoculations, rather than directly stating the administration as routine would paint a clear picture for the permissting authorities on effects of these inoculations.
The author also mentions that inoculations should be administered to all areas where disease is detected. A detailed comparison of sympotoms shown by people in affcted areas against the list of sysmptoms in cow flu is expected in this case. This would be useful to understand if the areas are actually affected by cow flu or there have been occurences of multiple diseases in the area and will depict to the permissting authorities about severity of disease.
The author mentions that there is a small possibility that a person will die due to these inoculations. A survey list that shows percentage of people who died due to administration of these inoculation against the number of people who were administered the inoculation is required as an evidence to support this statement. The survey should also mention the affected areas and time of administration as this would allow the permitting authority to evaluate whether the deaths were because of inoculations or due to other epidemic existing in the area at that time.
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 75
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 358 350
No. of Characters: 1804 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.35 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.039 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.068 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.867 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.663 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nistratoion
nistratoion of inoculations against cow flu to save...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 185, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this inoculation' or 'these inoculations'?
Suggestion: this inoculation; these inoculations
...eople who died due to administration of these inoculation against the number of people who were a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 358.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14525139665 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14667996969 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424581005587 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4699518258 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46666666667 5.70786347227 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366418542654 0.218282227539 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138383609935 0.0743258471296 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890817161682 0.0701772020484 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221899538078 0.128457276422 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366379607857 0.0628817314937 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 98.500998004 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.