Human beings have destroyed a large number of natural wilderness for their personal gain over thousand of centuries to an extent that, the pot of negligence and self serving motives have repleted. The prompt recommends that the nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that nations should put aside their avaricity for once and help serve in the interest of the nature due to the following three reasons.
Beauty does lie in the eye of the beholder but if we are to scrape off every piece of natural aesthete in the name of development and nation building, very soon we shall be surrounded only by tall buildings with rare signs of what it means to be naturally beautiful. A student finds leisure in the wild, a laborer finds rest in the wild, the old find peace in the wild. Human brain is trained to tone down the mental and physical strain in the presence of wilderness. Emotional stability and human health is equally at risk with the depleting wilderness, thus it is imperative that nations should enforce laws to save what is left of the natural wilderness and focus on stopping illegal encroachment.
On the other hand, the planet is burning and crying for help, the increasing climate change and global warming is evidence enough that it’s prime time to mitigate, if not completely stop, all the wrongs we have done to our planet. The temperature across the globe has increased causing the glaciers to melt, weather capricious and ample disasters from ever seen before. Thus, we can maintain without any doubt that the natural wilderness which has sustained human beings in this planet for this long is at stake and to ensure we get to eat the seed this planet bears, actions needs to be taken to nurture and protect it like it did us.
Also, the biodiversity we were gifted with the planet survives in the wilderness, being the greatest of all creations we owe it to them our selfless protection.
Instead, we have destroyed their home and as a rebellion against us they attack our home, wander in our vicinity causing risk of our lives and the lives of our family. Protecting the wilderness indirectly protects us from the wild animals, we have no match in a war with bare hands.
People might argue that making use of the wilderness for economic gain helps provide for large families with job opportunities. Yes, that’s true but for how long?
Let’s not forget that in our attempt to live luxuriously for now we aren’t stealing the future of our kids to live in a habitable planet. Wilderness provides for us, we must let it live in peace.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 66
- In order to save a considerable amount of money Rockingham s century old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy efficient building that some citizens have proposed The old town hall is too small to comfortably accommod 60
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 60
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Human beings have destroyed a large number of natural wilderness for their personal g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 28.8173652695 180% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 475.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77263157895 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51021536196 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 204.123752495 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566315789474 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4558146219 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.352941176 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9411764706 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329745844781 0.218282227539 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108738523137 0.0743258471296 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199658285105 0.0701772020484 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145230231515 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17824534957 0.0628817314937 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Human beings have destroyed a large number of natural wilderness for their personal g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 28.8173652695 180% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 475.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77263157895 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51021536196 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 204.123752495 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566315789474 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4558146219 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.352941176 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9411764706 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329745844781 0.218282227539 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108738523137 0.0743258471296 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199658285105 0.0701772020484 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145230231515 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17824534957 0.0628817314937 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.