The Mayor's recommendation to launch a campaign to attract Autotech to build its manufacturing plant in Hillview is based on an argument that is not well substantiated.
To asses if the recommendation is based on a reasonable premise, the Mayor has to clarify why has he or she chosen to woo Autotech in particular. The memo has no information regarding this and it is imperative to know if Autotech is even looking to build another manufacturing plant. In case, it turns out that Autotech is currently not keen on opening another plant, launching a campaign by the City Council would be a futile and wasteful. If indeed Autotech wants to open another plant, knowing the incentives it is looking for other than tax etc needs to be known to the city Council, to launch an effective campaign.
Seconfly, the recommendation indicates that the landfill area that the Mayor proposes as the site for the plant has been undeveloped for decades. Being left undeveloped for such an extended period of time, raises questions regarding the feasibility of setting up a heavy industry upon the landfill site. It needs to be evaluated if the landfill area needs some preparation or treatment by the Hillview agencies to make it a viable option for the plant.
The Mayor claims that the residents of Hillview rendered unemployed due to the shutting down of Computech, will get employment if Autotech opens its manufacturing plant in the area. However, the vast differences between the kind of human resources required in a software programming company and an automobile manufacturing plant makes the Mayor's claim questionable. Also, unlike a software programming company that requires mostly skilled programmers, an automobile plant can be highly automated and may not need as many human resources. So, information regarding the number of workers and the type of skill-set needed by Autotech needs to be properly assessed before adopting the recommendation.
Lastly, one more aspect that needs to be scrutinised is the reason behind Computech shutting down its national facility in Hillview. Plausible reason for this could be unsuitability of Hillview as a location in terms of ease of business, connectivity, strategic location, infrastructure etc. In such a scenario offering tax incentives by the City Council will not be sufficient enough to persuade Autotech. Consequently, the unemployment is the town will not be alleviated.
In light of above shortcomings in the Mayor’s recommendation, an in depth analysis of by the City Council is required to assess the potency of the recommendation.
- some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that the children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children 58
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped for decades, is a perfect site for the plant. The b 79
- “The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the la 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 83
- some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that the children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...g left undeveloped for such an extended period of time, raises questions regarding the feasibi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'look', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'in particular', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258771929825 0.25644967241 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.188596491228 0.15541462614 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0657894736842 0.0836205057962 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0394736842105 0.0520304965353 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0219298245614 0.0272364105082 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125 0.125424944231 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0657894736842 0.0416121511921 158% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21791805027 2.79052419416 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0416666666667 0.026700313972 156% => OK
Particles: 0.00657894736842 0.001811407834 363% => OK
Determiners: 0.127192982456 0.113004496875 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015350877193 0.0255425247493 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00877192982456 0.0127820249294 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2599.0 2731.13054187 95% => OK
No of words: 417.0 446.07635468 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23261390887 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.57801047555 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378896882494 0.378187486979 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31175059952 0.287650121315 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263788968825 0.208842608468 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16067146283 0.135150697306 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21791805027 2.79052419416 115% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 207.018472906 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501199040767 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 55.6555408271 52.1807786196 107% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 24.5294117647 23.2022227129 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7764182674 57.7814097925 48% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.882352941 141.986410481 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 23.2022227129 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.724660767414 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 55.7044717167 51.9672348444 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.79824561404 1.8405768891 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53889590004 0.441005458295 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164221847969 0.135418324435 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.081877075043 0.0829849096947 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.648384919087 0.58762219726 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166490939961 0.147661913831 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242432535431 0.193483328276 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981981297147 0.0970749176394 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410783348519 0.42659136922 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0643967978017 0.0774707102158 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351842705681 0.312017818177 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516887184588 0.0698173142475 74% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.82512315271 145% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.