The author mentions that the number of shoppers in central plaza are steadily decreasing since last two years. Author states the reason for decrease in number of people in central plaza is due to the increasing popularity of skateboarding. The author state skateboarders are responsible for the increase in the litter and vandalism in the central plaza. So, if the skateboarding is prohibited in the central plaza the number of shoppers will increase gradually. But the authors fails to provide the strong evidence that skateboarding was only the reason for the decline in the number of customers in central plaza.
Author fails to explain that was skateboarding only the reason for decline in the number of the customers? It may be the possible that some other store has been opened in the city which provides better products for the customer than the central plaza. It may be case that quality of products available at central plaza has deteriorated past two years. Also,how is the skateboarding related to the rise in the litter and vandalism? People not doing skate boarding may also be the reason for the increase in the litter and the vandalism. Maybe, the central plaza maintenance staff not doing their duty seriously.
First of all the author fails to mention about exact number shopper before two years and by what number has it decreased? Author also fails to answer the questions like , have all other shopping mall other than central plaza stopped skateboarding? Has skateboarding affected all the stores other than central plaza? If all the shopping malls are facing the problem of the litter and vandalism due to skateboarding than the authors reasoning is plausible. But if all the malls other than central plaza are doing extremely well even when they allow skateboarding then there is surely some other reason which has lead to decrease in the number of shoppers.
How many people do skateboarding in central mall? Has increase in popularity in skateboarding increase the number of people doing skateboarding in central mall? If the number of people engaged in skateboarding is significantly large to be considered cause for increase in litter and vandalism then the authors claim can be taken into consideration. What is the possibility that prohibiting skateboarding increase the number of customers again? Also ,how many central plaza store owners believe that decrease in their business is due to number of skateboards used in the plaza? If all the plaza owner believe the same then the authors claim can be considered. If only few store owners believe so, then it will fallacious claim.
Considering the all above facts the skateboarding cannot be directly associated with the decrease in the number of the shoppers. Thus, author has to answer all these questions to validate and make his claim more plausible that the skateboard user has really affected the number of footfalls at central plaza. Hence, skateboarding has to be prohibited in central plaza to increase the number of customers to previously high number.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, b 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 66
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter and vandalism in the central plaza. So, if the skateboarding is prohibited in the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , how
...za has deteriorated past two years. Also,how is the skateboarding related to the ris...
^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... also fails to answer the questions like , have all other shopping mall other than...
^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ease the number of customers again? Also ,how many central plaza store owners beli...
^^
Line 7, column 578, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...umber of skateboards used in the plaza? If all the plaza owner believe the same th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256074766355 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.175700934579 0.15541462614 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0785046728972 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0579439252336 0.0520304965353 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.014953271028 0.0272364105082 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142056074766 0.125424944231 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0672897196262 0.0416121511921 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83870111142 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0280373831776 0.026700313972 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.117757009346 0.113004496875 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.014953271028 0.0255425247493 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014953271028 0.0127820249294 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3053.0 2731.13054187 112% => OK
No of words: 500.0 446.07635468 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.106 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.57801047555 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378 0.378187486979 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252 0.287650121315 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182 0.208842608468 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12 0.135150697306 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83870111142 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 207.018472906 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.366 0.469332199767 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.4542399741 52.1807786196 79% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.039408867 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2307692308 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1258484063 57.7814097925 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.423076923 141.986410481 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.724660767414 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 44.4307692308 51.9672348444 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.87218045113 1.8405768891 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.720372211169 0.441005458295 163% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.223578356716 0.135418324435 165% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.149579658473 0.0829849096947 180% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615033177319 0.58762219726 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156430306293 0.147661913831 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3449807989 0.193483328276 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122815547669 0.0970749176394 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.566407184676 0.42659136922 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.107206885425 0.0774707102158 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.558899183743 0.312017818177 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676574394914 0.0698173142475 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.33743842365 180% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 6.46551724138 232% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 14.657635468 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.