The argument claims that taking Paleo diets will help human cure many chronic dieseases hence people should take this diet. Assuming given reasons stated to explain the conclusion correct, there is still paucity of evidence to support the claim. The author assumes that it's a belief that is not scientifically proved but has an anecdotal evidence whose autheticity isn't verified. It also assumes that skeptics who do not support the claim and does not provide any evidence to do so.
When people see a solution to a problem working out for them, they become inherent prponents of that solution without verifying the the righteouness of the solution. There are no universal solutions, every human is different, treatmets which work on one person may not work on another. The belief of proponents that this diet promotes healthy nutrients but there is no evidence and metric provided to support that having this diet healed joints and improved nerve regenration. Albeit the presence of anecdotal evidence provided some support to the claim but there is no evidence that the anecdote still holds true and humas are ever evolving and it is largely possible for humans to be developed to an extent that taking this diet has no effect on the body. Skeptics who propounded that taking this diet did not produce any effects on our brain and joints did not have any evidence to prove their standpoint.
The author also claims in the end that this diet can cure various chronic illnesses without providing any information on what kind of illnesses and how many of them. Do these illnesses have no other solution and the diet is the only way ti treat them or these illnesses are almost eradicated from earth. For example, this might be useful in curing a disease like polio, but in today's world it is almost eradicated so propounding this diet for curing such kind of outdated diseases undermines its relevence in current world.
Hence the claim concludes with a lot of assumptions and the conclusion can hold true if enough evidence is provided in terms of measure of success or any metric or any reliable data. There are a lot of unanswered qustions which put the claim in a dubious situation.
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 12 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 374 350
No. of Characters: 1791 1500
No. of Different Words: 193 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.398 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.789 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.483 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.9 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.57 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...port the claim. The author assumes that its a belief that is not scientifically pro...
^^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...an anecdotal evidence whose autheticity isnt verified. It also assumes that skeptics...
^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ents of that solution without verifying the the righteouness of the solution. There are...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ents of that solution without verifying the the righteouness of the solution. There are...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ines its relevence in current world. Hence the claim concludes with a lot of assum...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 373.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88203753351 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52047513144 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512064343164 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5131398763 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.071428571 119.503703932 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131665086733 0.218282227539 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492123305283 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249634682672 0.0701772020484 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769972277735 0.128457276422 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294063712168 0.0628817314937 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.