It is said that a person's nature is mostly defined as the cummulative of peer group he/she has. The thought process and ideas are mostly influenced by people we spend our time with and peers play a crucial role in that. And if a person is at a leadership role, he is looked upon as an inspiration for a cause and a person with sound moral judgement. However, a leadership role does not revolve around just one person, it involves a group of people and actions associated with this group directly links to the leader and hence I support the statement that it's important to maintain the respect of the peers.
To illustrate this behavior, Mahatma Gandhi has proven this statement in a very convincing manner. Mahatma Gandhi was a great leader,freedom fighter, his lead was followed and respected by a lot of Indians but his accomplishments were not just the result of his sole efforts and morals. The accomplishment he was trying to acheive were reinforced by fact that he respected the suggestions presented by his peers and took took criticism in a positive sense and concluded every action considering everybody's suggestion.
History has also presented us with various examples that can serve as a paradigm of a successful leadership where the leader has peer groups with expertise in different fields (can be called advisors) who would present their thoughts and criticism on actions and improve the roadmap to lead a path in the most successful and efficient way.
From what is commonly seen in the world, there is no 'one man army', there is always a group of people behind every construction and implementation of an idea and respecting other's option is one of the few prerequisites for a good leadership.
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 80
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
It is said that a persons nature is mostly defined as the cummula...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , freedom
...anner. Mahatma Gandhi was a great leader,freedom fighter, his lead was followed and resp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: took
... suggestions presented by his peers and took took criticism in a positive sense and concl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8566552901 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88224397172 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.703381263 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.111111111 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18482436537 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667600138012 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044378942992 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926684911665 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403269237829 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.