For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of our station have written to complain about what they describe as the un-American bias of the program. In addition, the local newspaper has published a recent editorial critical to our shift in programming. Therefore, in order to forestall any further adverse publicity for the station and to avoid the loss of additional listener-supporters, we should discontinue our current emphasis on Latino and world music and restore the time devoted to traditional American folk music to its former level."
The argument topic states that it is needed to change the current trend of the program, traditional folk music is important to the future time. This seems to be simple and easy going idea but in fact, that is not easy as described by this prompt. The assumption are not completely cogent. Author makes the one issue that is current critics that was published in local newspaper. In addition, author cast on doubt about the future of station. Moreover, this memorandum based on another assumption that about the some compaints.
To begin with, generally publishers of the newspaper seeking to attract the readers' attraction. In this sense, sometime they forget their duty and hurts the other reputation. It is not totally persuasive. For instance, in our country Nepal newspaper loss their reputation because same news interpreted by the different critics with different views. At that some critics fail to judge the important and right point. Perhaps station manager unable to take the right knowledge of the station.
Secondly, Future of the station determine the modern concept. Today's generation follow the modern songs, latino and world music. In this situation, why complaints are come from listners? Author says few complaints are come. All other are still happy with this change. This change also come from the valuable discussion with the listeners and station manager. Still many supporters are favor with this change.
Finally, some complaints are minor. There is no any work which has no complaint. It is needed to forget the trivial things while making decision. Station manager only can take their suggestion but not necessary to change the big issue. If many complaints are come daily, only after then he can think about the changing policy. Still he has many time to take response from listeners.
In conclusion, it is not needed to change the current program, these assumptions made by researchers are not persuasive. These are totally groundless. In order to make the secure future, it is needed to take new data from clients. It is best, while take the direct conversation from the listeners. For this research, station can conduct one special program to take suggestion. It is easy and simple for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | Technoblade | 68 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | s.sim | 55 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 64 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | villian7 | 58 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | SadiaIqtidar | 60 | view |
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wher 70
- The human mind is superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
- Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell ve 16
- n surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little 26
- people choose same course of study 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 512, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ed on another assumption that about the some compaints. To begin with, generally pu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readers'' or 'reader's'?
Suggestion: readers'; reader's
...of the newspaper seeking to attract the readers attraction. In this sense, sometime the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...with the listeners and station manager. Still many supporters are favor with this cha...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ly, some complaints are minor. There is no any work which has no complaint. It is ...
^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...he can think about the changing policy. Still he has many time to take response from ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...about the changing policy. Still he has many time to take response from listeners. In co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 366.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08196721311 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56109906161 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521857923497 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.8473053892 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6885322812 57.8364921388 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.0 119.503703932 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8064516129 23.324526521 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.51612903226 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105167118013 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237896281062 0.0743258471296 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474181981031 0.0701772020484 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534993058728 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230752564943 0.0628817314937 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.3799401198 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.1389221557 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.