The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a significant increase in applications and enrollment. However, the director of the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored keeping the college all female.
The presidents of Grove College suggest that college, unlike its old tradition, must admit men to study there because coeducation increases the college’s enrollments. Nevertheless, the director of the alumnae disagrees with this plan because he thinks the main factor of this college is full-female. In addition, two surveys show that all incoming students and most alumnae disagree with this plan. Scrutiny each of these factors, however, reveals that none of them lend credible supports to the recommendation.
First, base on the fact that coeducation was successful in other all-female colleges, the president infers that it can be useful in this college. Nonetheless, he ignores that it is entirely possible most students choose this college because the college all females, so coeducation can cause them to change their decision. Besides, this suggestion can lead students to leave college. Without considering this scenario, the faculty members cannot justifiably conclude that coeducation increases the students of the college.
Second, the director claims that students select this college for study only because it is full female. However, it is entirely possible the college offers more funds; so many students select here for study. In addition, the college may hire high educated teachers, which have an apparent role in attracting students. In short, if the director of the alumnae ignores all effective factors in this matter, I cannot take the director’s idea seriously.
In the third place, a serious of problems with the director’s claim arises with the scant statistical information on which it stands. The director of the alumnae claims that most incoming students select this college because it is full female, while all these students are female. Hence, a survey’s respondents cannot be representative of the overall population of students. Moreover, the number of alumnae who took part in the survey may was too low to ensure that majority of alumnae disagree with coeducation.
In sum, the argument is logically flawed and therefore, unconvincing. To strengthen the argument, the director of the alumnae must provide statistical information that the survey’ reflects of the general population. In order to evaluate the recommend, we need to know about all possible causes that student like to study in Grove College.
- A ten-year study of a group of 552 men from Elysia showed that long-term consumption of caffeinated black tea was associated with a much lower risk of stroke. Of these men, those who drank more than three cups of black tea a day had a 70 percent lower ris 48
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. 16
- What are the important qualities of a good son or daughter? Have these qualities changed or remained the same over time in your culture? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 43
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 50
- If you could meet a famous entertainer or athlete who would that be and why Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the director's idea seriously. In the third place, a serious of problems ...
^^
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eneral population. In order to evaluate the recommend, we need to know about all possible cau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...student like to study in Grove College.
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'in short', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258660508083 0.25644967241 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.124711316397 0.15541462614 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0854503464203 0.0836205057962 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0415704387991 0.0520304965353 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0323325635104 0.0272364105082 119% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136258660508 0.125424944231 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0115473441109 0.0416121511921 28% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.97242471533 2.79052419416 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207852193995 0.026700313972 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124711316397 0.113004496875 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0230946882217 0.0255425247493 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00923787528868 0.0127820249294 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2387.0 2731.13054187 87% => OK
No of words: 365.0 446.07635468 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.5397260274 6.12365571057 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.446575342466 0.378187486979 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.369863013699 0.287650121315 129% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.260273972603 0.208842608468 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142465753425 0.135150697306 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97242471533 2.79052419416 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 207.018472906 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515068493151 0.469332199767 110% => OK
Word variations: 55.3634711825 52.1807786196 106% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2105263158 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9154857572 57.7814097925 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.631578947 141.986410481 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05263157895 0.724660767414 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 56.1968276857 51.9672348444 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.04651162791 1.8405768891 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432852098479 0.441005458295 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132433714845 0.135418324435 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0727706721632 0.0829849096947 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.578998124594 0.58762219726 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.099707320674 0.147661913831 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185067204982 0.193483328276 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744982591248 0.0970749176394 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481354488107 0.42659136922 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0198186086061 0.0774707102158 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318498112897 0.312017818177 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495897987232 0.0698173142475 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.