SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreover, M

Essay topics:

SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreover, Middlesburg is a predominately urban area and according to an employee survey, SuperCorp has determined that its workers prefer to live in an area that is not urban. Finally, Corporateville has lower taxes than Middlesburg, making it not only a safer place to work but also a cheaper one. Therefore, Supercorp clearly made the best decision.

The argument concludes by stating the SuperCorp has made the best choice. This however would only be true if the choice of moving the Headquarters from Middlesburg to Corporateville was beneficial to both the company and the employees, meaning that it did not receive criticism from any involved party.

It can be noted that the employees prefer to not live in urban areas and as Middleberg is urban and Corporateville is not, it is assumed tht the employees are satisfied with the decision to move the headquarters. Moreover, it is mentioned that the number of homeowners in Corporateville has surged in the recent times. This further strengthens the point that Corporateville would be better suited to the employees.

Secondly, it is also stated that the tax rates in Corporateville is lower than that of Middlesberg, making it a better destination for commerce than the latter.

In either case, if the assumptions prove to be unwarranted, it would mean dissatisfaction of either one or all parties involved.
If Corporateville turns out to be ill-suited to the employees as their new homes, it might lead to poor performance of the employees or more number of transfers and resignations.

If the taxes even after being lower , still manages to harm or hinder the working of the company, the company might suffer financial losses or even fall into legal woes.

In conclusion, the argument is well supported by the assumptions, but the failure of any assumption can easily reduce the integrity of the whole argument.

Votes
Average: 2.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-20 jayauen 73 view
2023-03-10 Shubhan Mital 73 view
2021-08-22 rsaheed99 60 view
2021-08-08 maryam15 66 view
2020-10-20 hemantls 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user tanayagar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
...to poor performance of the employees or more number of transfers and resignations. If the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ns. If the taxes even after being lower , still manages to harm or hinder the wor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 2260.96107784 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 251.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06772908367 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14339822182 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 705.55239521 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5936970617 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.70786347227 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212310735362 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830195687681 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823998760151 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772783309337 0.128457276422 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759912577305 0.0628817314937 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 251 350
No. of Characters: 1238 1500
No. of Different Words: 138 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.98 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.932 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.052 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 61 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.584 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.763 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5