In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is therefore sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
<span style="font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">In the above argument author states that allocation more budget to clean Mason River would increase the river use for recreational activities. The author came to this conclusion based on the fact that water sports being the residents' favorite recreational activites. However, before this recommendation can be evaluated following assumptions must be examined.</span><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">First of all, it is stated that water sports such as swimming, boating and fishing are the favorite recreational activities of the residents. But, even after allocating more budget to the river side is there any guarantee that people will still do these river side activities. For example, Tennis is one of my favorite recreational activity. But, I am not able to play it because the sport is expensive, I need to book a ground and pay humongous amount to do my recreational activity. This means even if there is a chance to pursue recreational activity I cannot because of my financial restrictions. If the above scenario holds true even in case of Mason City people, the argument stated by author doesn not hold water.</span><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">Secondly, it is given that government should devote more money to riverside recreational facitlites. There is no evidence on why government has ignored this all these days. There can be other important problems in the country which government is primarily concentrating on and hence had to subside this thought to give the important ones more priority. For example, the traffic system in Mason City might be really bad and government must be spending more of its money to construction of flyovers so as to provide free flowing of vehicles. Also, if the city's sanitational facilities are utterly worse then that becomes the primary task to concentrate on, because it is a basic need. If the above scenario is true for Mason City then the recommendation suggested by author is not viable at this moment.</span><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">Additionally, it is given that government should devote more money to fulfill the hobbies of residents. There is no evidence provided that the government is genuine.</span><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><br style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"><span style="font-family: "Open Sans", arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">In conclusion, the argument as it stands now, is considerable flawed due to its reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the survey addresses the above assumptions by providing more supportive evidences (perhaps in form of systematic research study), then it will be possible to fully evaluate the viability of proposed recommendation.</span>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | jason123 | 59 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Ammu helen | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | ramji90 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | shekhawat24 | 49 | view |
- The following letter is from a group of Linford College alumni to the chair of the artdepartment at the college.“In a recent survey of college graduates, 90 percent agreed that participating in aninternship increased their chances of finding a job after 68
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 29
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 79
- As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk. 55
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 700 350
No. of Characters: 3975 1500
No. of Different Words: 213 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.144 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.679 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.034 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 277 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 223 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 200 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 172 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 36.842 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.965 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.459 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.459 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.258 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1405, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this river' or 'these rivers'?
Suggestion: this river; these rivers
...any guarantee that people will still do these river side activities. For example, Tennis is...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 3054, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...f its money to construction of flyovers so as to provide free flowing of vehicles. Also,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 3152, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse than'?
Suggestion: worse than
...tys sanitational facilities are utterly worse then that becomes the primary task to concen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, after all, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4627.0 2260.96107784 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 606.0 441.139720559 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.63531353135 5.12650576532 149% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.56307096286 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.09791928696 2.78398813304 183% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.354785478548 0.468620217663 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1283.4 705.55239521 182% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.59920159681 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.8473053892 175% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 333.415789801 57.8364921388 576% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 308.466666667 119.503703932 258% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.4 23.324526521 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 5.70786347227 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505755388106 0.218282227539 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525441842205 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432708101628 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505755388106 0.128457276422 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.8 14.3799401198 242% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -11.42 48.3550499002 -24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.1628742515 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.8 12.197005988 203% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 27.92 12.5979740519 222% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 24.0 12.3882235529 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 11.1389221557 162% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.