Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol

Essay topics:

Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The argument claims that woven baskets found in a prehistoric village of Palea were believed to have been made only by Palean people and not in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. Also describes that the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boats and no Paleans boats have been found. But does not mention any other kind of transport in the region that could be the possibility of trade, the existence of land between both villages and the timeline of Brim River.
The argument does not mention the existence of another kind of transport. The trade could happened by land that connects Palea a Lithos. Population could prefer to commerce in land because the river was extremely extense, for example. The lackness of this evidence weaks the validity of the argument.
Another evidence that does not exists in the argument is the timeline of Brim River. It lacks the year of the existence of both villages and maybe was a time that the river did not exist. So it was possible to perform the trade walking until both villages. Also could be a possibility that the Paleans were actually the ones who brought their woven baskets to Lithios. Therefore, another evidence that undermines the argument.
It is evident that this arguments lacks evidence and information that can sustain the hypothesis that woven baskets have been made only by the Palean people. According to the statements above, exists plenty of assumptions that undermines the argument.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-09 M1randa 55 view
2023-08-06 yuktapradeep 55 view
2023-07-30 Vivi5428 66 view
2023-07-30 Vivi5428 68 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 16 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Nicole Metzner :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...llage across the Brim River from Palea. Also describes that the ancient Paleans coul...
^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...ther kind of transport. The trade could happened by land that connects Palea a Lithos. P...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exist'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: exist
...gument. Another evidence that does not exists in the argument is the timeline of Brim...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the trade walking until both villages. Also could be a possibility that the Paleans...
^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...mines the argument. It is evident that this arguments lacks evidence and informatio...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, may, so, therefore, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 2260.96107784 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.936 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4511744124 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 204.123752495 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 705.55239521 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6998108622 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1428571429 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 5.70786347227 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252151324193 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083375741172 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137807594968 0.0701772020484 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164941946996 0.128457276422 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148038998689 0.0628817314937 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 250 350
No. of Characters: 1209 1500
No. of Different Words: 110 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.976 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.836 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.384 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.158 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.364 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5