A) Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts
Arts are language that all people speak regardless of their racial, culture or social background. Arts are based on creativeness, imagination and innovation. It requires the skills and talent of artists. The topic of funding arts has been debatable over a long period of time. I believe that governmental funding for arts is essential to ensure that arts can flourish and be available to all people for several reasons. However there must be an organization that audit and watch the governmental practices of funding arts so it won’t threaten arts integrity.
Firstly, arts are talent which is given not earned. No one chooses to be a talented artist, musician, poet or even sculptor. This talent does not differentiate among people. It is not specified only for rich people who can promote this talent and have the financial support. Since fine arts are mostly non profitable, some people chose to kill their talent because they needed money for living. They choose a job with good money rather than reinforcing the gift they were given. If government did not sponsor these people and provide them with the necessary funding, many forms of fine arts will diminish and would not have been existed.
Secondly, the glory of the Greek, Roman and ancient Egyptian history was traced through walls of museums and old paintings. They show the progress of a nation civilization, history and culture. That’s why many countries value fine arts and they are quite aware of their national importance and the necessity of funding. For example, cities like Paris, Rome and London allocate a significant part of their budgets for funding arts and museums. They try to gather most of the important pieces from all over the world which in return help them in increasing their touristic activities and national income.
On the other hand, there must be organizations that audit the governmental practices of arts funding. If governments were biased to certain types of arts that serve their political motives, this will threaten the integrity of the arts. For instance, the Soviet Union used to fund arts that support its governmental ideology for a long time.
Finally, arts with all their different forms must be supported and funded by the government to ensure that they are flourished and be available to all people taking into consideration the governmental practices that might threaten integrity of arts.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-07-31 | Reham Youssef | 70 | view |
- The surface of a section of Route 101 paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes In another part of the state a section of Route 40 paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago is sti 87
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 73
- Please evaluate my issue essay for GRE exam Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consi 50
- Please evaluate my GRE argument essayOver the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease 70
- 1 Arctic deer live on islands in Canada s arctic regions They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough at 61
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 395 350
No. of Characters: 1961 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.458 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.965 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.562 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.955 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.431 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.302 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.501 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5