In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is there a real hero who saves people, conducts good deeds, and receives reverence from the public, but does not have any defects? It seems not. With the advent of media, being a hero has become almost impossible for the following reasons.
Firstly, intensive media coverage of these days frequently reveals misbehaves of those who called heroes. Humans are not perfect and all of us have defects however it is severe or trifling. However, there are some people who are called heroes who believed to have perfect personalities. Can it be real? Perhaps no. Those who called heroes might be the people whose defects or badness have not yet revealed. People are intrigued by those who seem perfect and expect that they would be different from us. Then, with this kind of interest, the media covers them more intensely tracking all the behaves and movements. However, since there is no perfect person, the media will soon catch some disappointing moments - it can be a severe one or just a small one. If those are reported in news or on YouTube, the public will be disappointed and those will not be able to be called heroes anymore. Thus, as people are not perfect and intensive media coverage would reveal it, no one can be considered a hero.
Secondly, media sometimes convey false news, and once people’s perception gets negative, recovering it is difficult. Media always want to make somewhat astonishing to draw more interest from people. So, they are eager to catch some socking moments of heroes tracking all of their footprints. However, this attitude is detrimental to report disinterested facts, and it makes them susceptible to report false news. If false news had a huge influence on the public, it would be hard to return. Once the public is disappointed about something, they are more likely to keep that disappointed state. Thus, once the media misreport about heroes, they will lose their position as heroes without opportunities to exculpate themselves.
Perhaps some still believe that there are real heroes and they can maintain their pristine names forever. However, due to the media, it has become almost impossible especially considering the two points mentioned in this article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Yam Kumar Oli | 79 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | mojammel1501114 | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | Ahmed.I | 62 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | anon7652 | 54 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 87
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 66
- Should schools monitor students online activities 68
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 62
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03551912568 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61829468144 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.81938519 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7727272727 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109230472778 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366546963958 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380382591641 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737241085453 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285923934192 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.