In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The hero is the one who is adored by many people and have significant influence in the lives of the people following him/her. Medias not only bring the positive aspects but also reveal the negative aspects of the celebrities; which in fact, sometimes diminish the popularity of hero among the people. Therefore, I am mostly dissonant with the prompt above.
To begin, sometimes the fame of the hero might get to the nadir of his career due to the media coverage of his dark sides. For instance, take Paul Shah who was one of the prolific actor of Nepal but recently people barely like him; it was because of the recent controversy regarding rape case. Although he is justified of being not guilty, he is still unable to get out of the predicament; and he is rarely getting any role in the movies and music videos. So, in rare cases intensive media coverage can degrade the prestige and career of the hero.
However, in most of the cases media plays as positive catalyst to reach the eminence of their career. For instance, Cristano Ronaldo one of the greatest footballer of all time is more famous because of the social media. He has over 500 million of followers in Instagram and millions of followers in other platforms like facebook, twitter, etc. Media has brought his exercise and eating habits, which people like a lot and people can get incentives to do hard work. People regard him as the epitome of hard work and success.
Like Ronaldo, Dr. Sanduik Ruit is one of the brilliant ophthalmologist of the world. He has cured over eighty thousands of eye patients (suffering from eye cataract), mostly belonging to the Asia and Africa, in cheap price that even the poorest person can afford. For this work, he has been awarded with the Asian equivalent of novel price. I came to know about him by reading him in the newspaper. People get to know the people like him though the news and media coverage and media help them to become public hero.
In sum, sometimes it is possible that the intensive media coverage has cons on the life of hero, but the pros of it far undermine its negative sides as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Yam Kumar Oli | 79 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | mojammel1501114 | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | Ahmed.I | 62 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | anon7652 | 54 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 60
- Archeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mammal known as Reponomamus Pobustus 3
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 60
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
- Essay topics A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community Do you support or oppose the factory Explain your position 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'eighty thousand'.
Suggestion: eighty thousand
...ologist of the world. He has cured over eighty thousands of eye patients suffering from eye catarac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64361702128 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42814342429 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539893617021 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0208279108 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153414338696 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487160044321 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377188272108 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917203369039 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128103158847 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.