An ailing patient should have an access to his/her doctor`s record.
The author here possesses a view that an ailing patient should have an access to his/her doctor`s record to verify that whether a doctor is competent to treat that medical condition or not.Here I partially agree with the author`s belief.A patient suffering from specific daises should have right to know that the doctor with whom he/she is getting treatment do have experience to deal with that disease they are suffering from or not.
Today the world is all about specialization and mastery.And people prefer to utilize and take gain of area of expertise of domain specific experts.This is especially essential in medical science where the domain is vast and crucial as far as the matter of living being is concern.In such cases if doctor`s history is accessible to patient then they may better identify the ability of doctor as well as can have mental relaxation that their life is in safe hands.There may be a case that someone is new in specific territory and unknown to the surroundings.In such case a person can recognize a correct doctor without taking help of others if the doctor`s history is accessible.
There are few cases when doctor cheat patients in a fraud way by giving an assurance of better health and cure even though the patient`s disease is out of their scope and knowledge. In.In such case a patient may check their history and come to know the truth.Here patient will able to save their time, money and mental harassment they may need to pass through if history of doctor would not accessible to them.It is also beneficial for doctor to create trust on them for patients. Experts do not need to spent their time in marketing and proving their veracity as everything is open and accessible.
On the other hand we have to accept that often medical science work on assumptions,experiments and past experience.It may be the case that all of sudden a new disease arrives and spread very quickly through which even doctor is unknown or out of his study and experience.In such case if a patient belief to consult doctor by checking their history then they will not get any doctor.In such case a doctor doing treatment of patient will always under suspicion. And.And as we know that doctor`s hands are as of god, such skeptic belief is not beneficial for patient as well as doctor. This applies to even novice doctors.If all patients goes with experienced doctors then how a neophyte will get a stand or platform. After all experience make a man perfect.
At last concluding altogether considering major analysis aspects, the gist of an issue can be wrapped in a concise words that for shake of ailing patient`s welfare doctor`s history should be accessible but still one should never blindly rely on that only and should not keep any prejudice nor predilection towards a doctor and his/her ability.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-07 | Saket Choudhary | 50 | view |
2023-06-29 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
2023-02-15 | shalin63 | 50 | view |
2023-01-15 | Jorobe8 | 50 | view |
2022-11-19 | Swarnali Swarno | 58 | view |
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 30
- An ailing patient should have an access to his/her doctor`s record. 80
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 10
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
flaws:
Always put a space after punctuation marks. Essay e-rater is sensitive.
-------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 500 350
No. of Characters: 2291 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.729 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.582 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.421 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 165 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 45.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 27.167 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.374 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.656 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.143 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5