An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Additionally, the old addage that you can't improve what you don't measure is also true in this case. Just the mere fact that a doctors performance and success rate is not only going to be measure but made public is also incentive enough to make a medical profession be at his very best with every patient he or she treats. It also evens the playing field for less affluent or well known patients as every patient's vote or ranking of the doctor's performance counts the same, so the doctor is motivated to give his or her best to every patient.
It should also be noted, that practice leads to improvements in just about any field. As a doctor is continually scored positively in the treatment of a particular type of illiness, his or her popularity and patient list will grow in that area, leading to more opportunties to perfect the treatment of that particulare illiness. This allows the doctor to more finely hone his skills in this one area and specialize in this area. A doctor who has seen a plethora of different cases in one field is less likely to mis-diagnose someone with this issue. She will also better understand the nuances of the different ways the illiness can present and react to treatment which is helpful to avoid wasted time and energy on treatments that would work as effectively.
One could argue that having all the doctors past records be available to the public is a violation of the doctor's privacy and that of his other patients. It is however very easy to keep the names and identifying information of each patient private which takes care of the past patient concerns. On the privacy of the doctor or the fact that some patients may embellish the truth, the doctor can always be given an opportunity to give a response to every record or ranking given by a patient.
When life and health is at stake, it is definitely best to give a patient the maximum information needed for them to best decide who they would like to trust to care for their medical needs. Transparency leads to more open and honest dealings on the part of the medical professionals and will leaded to greater specialization which creates a great body of experience and a higher level of performance with time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the sale national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
Additionally, the old addage that you cant improve what you dont measure is also t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d addage that you cant improve what you dont measure is also true in this case. Just...
^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...in this case. Just the mere fact that a doctors performance and success rate is not onl...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...s every patients vote or ranking of the doctors performance counts the same, so the doc...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...ble to the public is a violation of the doctors privacy and that of his other patients....
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 294, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...t of the medical professionals and will leaded to greater specialization which creates...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67857142857 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62342032158 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7527446775 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.076923077 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1538461538 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222670809288 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802865219068 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651909440281 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137064691862 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778584404983 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.